Professor’s fellowship terminated for speaking out on global warming in the Wall Street Journal
Posted on June 12, 2014 by Anthony Watts
It seems necessary to muzzle scientists who disagree with ‘Global Warming Due To Man’. The ‘approved’ Scientific Community is behaving like the Catholic Church who burnt scientists at the stake for declaring that the world was round not flat. (see 2012 – 015)
From Climate Depot: Fired for ‘Diverging’ on Climate: Progressive Professor’s fellowship ‘terminated’ after WSJ OpEd calling global warming ‘unproved science’
Professor’s fellowship ‘terminated’ after WSJ OpEd declaring ‘the left wants to stop industrialization—even if the hypothesis of catastrophic, man-made global warming is false’ – (see 2014 – 014 and 2014 – 017). Prof. Caleb Rossiter: ‘Just two days after I published a piece in the Wall Street Journal calling for Africa to be allowed the ‘all of the above’ energy strategy we have in the U.S., the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) terminated my 23-year relationship with them…because my analysis and theirs ‘diverge.’
IPS email of ‘termination’ to Rossiter: ‘We would like to inform you that we are terminating your position as an Associate Fellow of the Institute for Policy Studies…Unfortunately, we now feel that your views on key issues, including climate science, climate justice, and many aspects of U.S. policy to Africa, diverge so significantly from ours’
In an exclusive interview with Climate Depot, Dr. Rossiter explained:
“If people ever say that fears of censorship for ‘climate change’ views are overblown, have them take a look at this: Just two days after I published a piece in the Wall Street Journal calling for Africa to be allowed the ‘all of the above’ energy strategy we have in the U.S., the Institute for Policy Studies terminated my 23-year relationship with them…because my analysis and theirs ‘diverge.’”
“I have tried to get [IPS] to discuss and explain their rejection of my analysis,’ Rossiter told Climate Depot. “When I countered a claim of ‘rapidly accelerating’ temperature change with the [UN] IPCC’s own data’, showing the nearly 20-year temperature pause— the best response I ever got was ‘Caleb, I don’t have time for this.’”
Author : JohnOh (IP: 184.108.40.206 , d211-31-207-89.sun802.vic.optusnet.com.au)
E-mail : firstname.lastname@example.org
Whois : http://whois.arin.net/rest/ip/220.127.116.11
Australia: Leading scientists have been sacked when working for the government if they disagree with what they say!
EG Doug Lord, a coastal engineer in NSW made the career-ending mistake of measuring the sea levels, and then trying to publish a paper on the actual 0.9mm/yr rise he actually found.
Amid exaggerated predictions that sea levels would rise by 75m, Lord made the career-ending mistake of actually measuring the sea level and trying to publish the results.
Lord’s data showed they had exaggerated the rise by 1000 per cent. The funny thing is he is not even a climate sceptic.
Many other examples can be found. CSIRO scientists have quit in disgust.
Ian Plimer, an Australian Scientist asks: “If the science of human induced global warming is so strong, then why is it necessary for the climate industry to engage in fraud, exaggeration,
obfuscation, personal attacks, spin and the demonising of dissent?”
Is it really man made? Or is the Sun, affected by the large planets, much like the moon affects our tides, but instead
affect the Solar surface and energy output as now seems to be the case! Scientists have created graphs relating to planetary positions and solar variances seem to make it a logical conclusion. http://www.landscheidt.info/ Obama would look like he was, as us Australians like to say ” A bit of a dill not concerned with the truth!”