A FAIR SOLUTION TO BRITAIN’S IMMIGRATION PROBLEM
Our rulers – Mrs Merkel and Hollande – have demanded that all European countries take their “fair share” of the (mainly Muslim) migrant hordes (Swarms?) over-running Europe ‘s apparently unguarded borders.
But how do you decide what a “fair share” is? Merkel and Hollande try to link the number of migrants to each country’s GDP as that will ensure Britain gets landed with most of the flood of human beings pouring into Europe .
But why not link the number of refugees each country takes to its population density?
Here is how it works out.
Europe’s most densely populated country is England . England ‘s
population density is 413 people per square kilometre (413 ppl/km2).
Now, how many refugees would the main European countries need to take
for them to reach the same population density as Europe’s most densely populated country ? England ?
To reach the same population density as England (413 ppl/km2), Germany could take 67 million migrants, France could accommodate a whopping 160 million and Spain and even larger 161 million. And our close neighbours in Scotland have room for over 25 million! That should please Socialist Sturgeon.
In all, just thirteen European countries could accommodate more than 680 million migrants before reaching the same population density as England .
Well. That seems to solve the problem of deciding how countries should take their “fair share” of the migrant swarm. So, using my calculations, there’s no need for Europe’s most densely populated country – England – to take any migrants at all and our friends in these thirteen countries can comfortably absorb over 680 million migrants.
That seems to me to be giving each country the “fair share” that Merkel and Hollande demand!
It is very fair and politically correct to argue that England is full