2024 – 008 the-origins-of-labour is not what it has become

Mick Greenhough editor@theeuroprobe.org

If you are baffled by the apparently bizarre and anti British decisions of the New Labour Party this essay should help you understand why. However our political Illuminati, whether Labour, Tory, Lib Dem or Green can be considered as essentially a Uni Party and remote from the great majority of voters. They have all gone to great lengths to ensure BREXIT has been nothing more than BRINO and that the interests of foreigners are given preference over those of native Britons. They all seem to subscribe to the UN Agenda 2030. We think we have elected a Labour Party in 2024 (masquerading as a Labour Party to get elected) but it is now showing its true colours as a Toxic Socialist Party – read on

If you see anything in this article you think is incorrect please inform the editor.

I come from a line of coal miners. Due to the complete lack of Safety Procedures my grandfather was very badly injured underground so much so that he was never unable to work again. My father, who at the age of 10 had won one of four open schoarships in Derbyshire on the basis of his ability at maths, had to leave school to go down the mine when he was 11 and his young brother also who was 9. Grandad was generously awarded 5 shillings and bag of coal a week so the pennies they earnt were essential. As such you would have thought they would be ardent Socialists or even Marxists but they were devout Protestant Primitive Methodists and Chartists. Incidentally they worked in the same pit as Dennis Skinner’s dad. They were very patriotic and pro British and my dad would turn in his grave if he knew of the anti British policies of todays Socialist ‘Labour’ Party. He was incensed as he felt his Labour Party has been hijacked even then by Socialist toffs and how they have betrayed what our ancestors had fought so hard to establish. The Labour Party of today is no longer the ‘Party of the Working Class’.

Coal mine workers in a elevator in. 1920 Belgium. : r/pics

A true British worker and how coal miners were treated when working (also known as ‘White Privilige’)

What is a ‘workimg man’? Any person who generates some meaningful ‘wealth’ in their working time surely?

However strategic industries such as coal, electricity, water, gas should be under the control of the British people not the the government who treat them as their personal property. The shares should be wholy owned by only British citizens, not for resale and run by those who know how to run a company not politically motivated civil servants.

Mick Greenhough  editor@theeuroprobe.org

So what is the origin of the Labour Party?

In 1534 Henry VIII had a conflict with the Pope as to who had ultimately authority over England. Henry resolved the dilema by giving the Pope the bums rush and destroying his Catholic power base of monks in the monastries. However he did not do so in Ireland as then it was a very remote and forgotten land and that has led to problems even today.  He then established the Church of England. Martin Luther had recently started the Protestant anti Pope movement so the CoE steadfastly adopted Protestantism. Henry remained a Catholic to his death so the Reformation was driven mainly by Thomas Cranmer, Elizabeth 1, William Tyndale and Cromwell. Since then England has had fight some very bloody battles to keep the Pope out of the UK. However the CoE is almost a clone of the CoR but without Confession, Mass and with NO Popery. It retained nearly all the CoR’s authoritarianism, bells, smells and fancy regailia. This led to the birth of the Methodist Church by those who rejected that authoritarianism and adopted more plain attire. As is human nature the Methodist clergy in time began to adopt the authoritarianism of the CoE. The new emerging industrial age required workers who were both literate and numerate so the working men started to become educated and, most dangerous of all, began to ‘read’. In 1800 some of those working men began to reject that new, increasing authoritarianism of the Methodist clergy so they were thrown out of the Methodist Church. They felt they did not need a ‘gate keeper’ to speak to God for them as they could speak to him directly themselves. They were still devout Christians and became known as Primitive Methodists who did not indulge in the brainwashing of children but passed their lifestyle on to their children by example. They started street preaching and became very popular and resonated with working men particularly in the heavy industries such as the mines, potteries, steel, textile workers etc. Those working in these new industries began to become more affulent and assertive. Then in 1838 the Chartist Movement started by working men who demanded enfranchisement. 

The industrial age led to much exploitation of workers from children and women working in the mines to them also being expoloited in the textile mills. However there were many other industrial employers who at the same time built model villages for their workers and valued their workers as humans not just beasts of burden. The Jacksons in Ironbridge to the Roundtrees, Cadbury’s and the Peabody Housing.

In 1838 the working men began the People’s Charter that called for six reforms to make the political system more democratic:

  • A vote for every man aged twenty-one years and above, of sound mind, and not undergoing punishment for a crime.
  • The secret ballot to protect the elector in the exercise of his vote.
  • No property qualification for Members of Parliament (MPs), to allow the constituencies to return the man of their choice.
  • Payment of Members, enabling tradesmen, working men, or other persons of modest means to leave or interrupt their livelihood to attend to the interests of the nation.
  • Equal constituencies, securing the same amount of representation for the same number of electors, instead of allowing less populous constituencies (rotten boroughs) to have as much or more weight than larger ones.
  • Annual parliamentary elections, thus presenting the most effectual check to bribery and intimidation, since no purse could buy a constituency under a system of universal manhood suffrage in every twelve months.

It was the Primitive Methodists, who had acquired the skills of public speaking by their street preaching, who were able to give voice to the Chartist men assembling outside of the factories. From this cooperation the Labour Party was formed by Kier Hardy, a Scottish miner turned journalist, in 1892 and the Trade Unions joined in. There were several examples of workers striking to demand better wages and conditions in the early 1800s but they were very local and uncoordinated. The Trade Unions were formally made legal in 1834 but were only ad hoc until much later and were generally formed from the much earlier trade guilds and the Labour Party formed from those Trade Unions. They were almost completely from the ‘working class’. My old dad was very conscious that there were no Spiv Lawyers, Academics, middle class Fabians, nieve undergraduates or showbiz dilittantes working down the pit then or since. Today you have to be a right Posh lad to be a leading Socialist

With the exporting of our manufacturing facilities overseas ‘to boost inward investment'(???) by the succesive governments the ‘working men’ of the heavy industries have all but gone. They have more or less been replaced by people who will be in financial difficulties if they do not get their cash in hand at the end of each month and are at the mercy of the state’s conditional benevolence.

Image

Sadly the Labour Party of the workers has long since been hijacked by the Spiv Socialists, all tending to crypto Marxism, offering freebees for votes (but paid for by the taxpayer) with very few ‘working men’ left. The New ‘Working Class’ are now just voting fodder for those self aclaimed toffs running the Labour Party. Wealthy Marxists are continually quietly trying to take over the Labour Party.

The Union leaderships often hijacked by the Marxist Tendancy.

The number of Labour MPs who had working-class jobs before entering politics are in steady decline as Labour HQ implant their chosen complient ex-intern graduates (who have rarely had a proper wealth producing job, if any) into constituencies to be their candidates.

Workers such as the railway workers should buy shares in their rail company then they will get a share of the profits each year instead of striking for more pay and blackmailing the passengers to achieve it?

Why and how have the ‘working class’ lost control of their Labour Party? The Labour Party of 2024 is far more concerned with their Union paymasters and Socialist dogma than the pensioners and ‘working class’.

What is the Parliamentary Internship Programme? | PIP

Envisioned by backbench Member of Parliament (MP) Alfred Hales in 1969, the non-partisan Parliamentary Internship Programme (PIP) creates unique training opportunities for young professionals and recently brainwashed university graduates, to increase their knowledge of Parliament, and provide MPs with skilled assistants during their ten-month tenure. Children of the working classes or those with work experience need not apply. This seems to apply to all parties as it also supplies a steady stream of Wet Tory and Lib Dem MPs.

Labour MPs with a working class background. More and more MPs and their hangers-on have only ever worked as or for politicians. The number of working men is steadily reducing.

1992-1997: 59 MPs

1997-2001: 55 MPs

2001-2005: 49 MPs

2005-2010: 37 MPs

2010-2015: 20 MPs

2015-2017: 13 MPs

2017-2019: 12 MPs

2019-now: 7 MPs and one of them is in Reform Party

This has happened to the Tory Party as well which is why so many Non True Tories have been elected as ersatz Tory MPs. Many Tory MPs are now a Pale shadow of the Tories of the Thatcher era – the One Nation Tories.

Many of the Unions have been infiltrated and hijacked by Marxist militants. (view the film ‘The Angry Silence’ with Richard Attenborough 1960 where even his kids were attacked at school by Marxist ‘useful idiots’). The remit of the Marxist leadership is to exploit the solidarity of the Trade Union members as a means to try to reduce our very successful Industrial Society and Market economy to a destitute shambles. They can then rebuild a brave new Marxist society from the ashes. The overwhelming strength of working men is their collective solidarity when bargaining or striking. This causes a conflict within those striking who realise their ‘solidarity’ is being exploited by their Union Leaders for nefarious ends.  These leaders are now more interested in exploiting that collective power of the working men to achieve politically damaging or change an elected government rather than improving their members welfare, which now seems to be useful but periferal. Today’s Labour Party and Unions leaders are nothing like what they started out as and they clearly no longer represent ‘the workers’. Now many Labour MPs have motives that are quite different to those who they have persuaded to vote for them. Many Union leaders also have very different motives as well from those of their members and take any reason to call a strike if it will damage the government. In this they are often aided and abeted by the pig headed and arrogant attitude of the management.

How do Marxists become leaders of Unions? From personal experience when being actively involved in, and assisting in, a strike when an apprentice and getting to know the Shop Convenor – who I much later found out to be a member of the UK Communist Party. He clearly took a shine me and explained that conflicts over pay and conditions were only reasons to be given to the workers. The Union had other agenders to exploit – which they could exagerate and then to call a strike. We won our apprentices strike and got a pay rise but the company then cancelled the Gratis Christmas bonus so in the end we were not much better off. I was gutted but the Shop Convenor told me it did not matter that the strike had not fully achieved its aim. If it had damaged the company then it had been worth it.  Arthur Scargill, Red Robbo and Jack Dash are  good examples of that opinion. Any strike, regardless of its outcome, is considered by the Marxist leaders to be a success. “if it has damaged the company/country then even if the strike fails to achieve its desired outcome it is considered a success”. The Rail and Doctors strikes of today are good examples.

An interesting follow up was that I then went to Kingston CAT to do a Dip Tech in Mechanical Engineering. I was having a cup of tea in a break one morning when 2 blokes came and sat with me. They were obviously not of the college. They clearly knew of my involvment in the strike and were trying to recruit me to become chairman of the students union with an offer of £20/month – cash (my monthly wage was then £16.2s) through my letter box if I did. I was not ameanable so they stormed off in a huff. I never found out who they were or where that money was to come from. 

It was about this time I started bumping into the Sevenoaks Young Socialists. I was puzzled as most of them lived in very large detached houses with 2 or 3 cars in the drive – frequently in private roads. Many of them got a new car for their 21st birthday. They were extremely arrogant and as said earlier and regarded anyone who did not agree with them as ignorent lumpen proletariats. ‘You have to be very Posh now to be a leading Socialist’ . A good example is the very wealthy champaigne crypto Marxists running the Junior Doctors strike. Basically they are God awfull Snobs on the basis of their parents achievements. The junior Doctors should have a pay increase to catch up with inflation but the NHS spends their money on Diversity Officers, Net Zero Officers and other non clinical posts who are clearly far more important to the NHS than doctors. The money is not there post Covid, the country is skint, and they want to expolit the juniour Drs need to help destroy our democraticly elected government.

The Shop Convenor also persuaded me to attended a couple of Union meetings which were quite eye openers. The most important weapon working men have is their solidarity. My personal experience is that the activists will call a Union meeting in the evening when other events are on (a big football match?) but some of the ‘normal’ members would still  attend. The activists would then proceed to drone on endlessly on petty, boring subjects until all those ‘wrong’ members got fed up and went home. They would then have the meeting proper and an election to elect themselves as the shop stewards  ‘at an organised Union meeting’, all perfectly ‘democratic’???’

If several Unions can coordinate their strikes so much the better.

By the ’80s many coal mines had to be closed as they were worked out after 300 years of mining the coal and were completely uneconomic, often bring up more bats than coal. Wilson closed down far more mines than Thatcher. Scargill called the the miners out on strike ostensibly to stop the closures but really it was to try to bring down the elected government.  Thatcher and Walker outsmarted Scargill and won the very nasty and diversive strike. The mines still had to close but many of the redundant miners were not found viable alternative work and many close-knit mining communities were devastated. It was done to quickly with little or poor planning.

The Unions also successfully completely wrecked the UK car and ship building industries so they moved overseas or went bankrupt. When the manufacturing of some of them returned to the UK they had foreign owners who get the profits. The docks were saved by containerisation and the Print Media saved by Digital printing.

It is surely the long term objective of Socialism, Net Zero, the UN (agenda 2030), their institutions and the EU Commission to destroy the Anglosphere and their traditions for a toxic Socialist state.

As said this decline was often aided and abetted by management who were usually extremely arrogant and pig headed who are more interested in the ‘bottom line’ of the accounts than improving their products. Often by managers who have taken over from those who started and built up the companies.

It was never the intention of the Chartists and Prims that they would be represented by a Socialist and Marxist elite. They are more intent on using the strength of the members and strikes to help destroy the Free Market Economy for a Marxist Soviet state than the improving their members lifestyle.

Labour no longer represents the ‘working man and woman’ but then who does with the Tory Party no longer Tory and the Lib Dems and Greens are little more than Woke joke parties. The main parties Tory, Labour, Lib Dem & Greens are all more or less the same following the UN 2030 policy. Perhaps the Reform Party is now the Party for all gainfully working people ( the workers, not just the working class) and all people in difficulty? We can only live in hope.

We have a ‘Labour’ party in power by default not by any enthusiasm for it but by the utter failure of the ersatz Tory party – an extreme left wing Socialist party masquerading as Labour. Can we expect Rachel from Accounts to set a annual tax regeime of 20% of your total wealth (the value of your Savings, House and all of your other goods) for the ‘good of the country’?

The time line for this is yet to play out for the Labour Party. Starmer has stated on TV that he prefers Davos to Westminster. ie He is a Globalist supporter of the WEF and as such will put the interests of unelected Global Illuminati before the interests of the British people who elected him.

First envisaged by Adam Weishardt in 1776 when he was tasked by the American international banks to produce a New World Order (now Globalism) of three orders and their cultures.

From this there are roughly 2 World Views that are mutually incompatable – Globalism and Populism (You could include Islam as well )

Globalism – A world Socialist government where the individual is completely subservient to the state and has virtually no personal rights, property and no Nations.

Populism – Where the individual has personal rights and the government is subservient to the people and the various peoples have their own different National countries and cultures .

Illuminati of the NWO of a few immensly wealthy families, International banks and international Corporates who are completely unelected who will rule the whole world.

The Illuminate of the UK are senior members of all the main political parties (+ a few hopefuls). The exceptions being the Reform Party and probably the SDP who do not subscribe to the UN Agenda 2030

The Nomenklatura (also known as the Lickspittles)- who have a very comfortable and cosseted life style (similar to our Civil Service) but have to carry out the edicts of the Illuminati without question.

The Lumpen Proletariat -the working class – who are surfs and do all the work for little or no reward (that’s us folks). They consist of three groups – the workers, those who, for valid reasons, are unable to work and those for whom not-working is a life style.

They have forgotten to include a class of skilled electricians, plumbers, builders etc ie those who work and who keep society functioning.

The original Labour Party of the Working Class, Chartists, Primitive Methodists and Kier Hardy has been hijacked by Benign Socialist Toffs of middle class Fabians, spiv lawyers, academics and show biz dillitanties who are on a mission creep to Toxic Socialism – then a mission creep to Authoritarian Globalism (now known as The New World Order or The World Economic Forum). They wish a world without borders, nations, different individuals but everybody the same – Coudenhove’s Mestizo people.

Working class (the lumpen proletariat – that’s us folks – the worker class and middle class) — You are entitled to the fruits of you labour, A fair days pay for a fair days work, importance of family, Family bring up their children, you can own property, you can travel freely, complete free speech to the point of being rude and offensive, very proud of our history, you can save up to send your child to a better school, believe in only being ruled with their consent, very Patriotic and proud of being British, you work to support your family, entitled to pass on your accumulated wealth to your next of kin, you can do anything that does not harm others, very pro Monarchy. Object strongly to Rape Gangs and criminality, The human rights of victims are more important than those of the criminal, Will have to dine on meal worms and locusts with no meat in the future??, Not consulted on the experiment on Diversity, Generally Christian but some with a small c. Believe in a free market economy. They are todays Ballot Fodder of the Benign Socialists.

Can be summed up as Populism

Benign Socialism — 3 days work for 5 days pay, Degrades the concept of family, State subtly controls the education of children, tolerates free speech but limits it by calling speech they do not like Hate speech, supports cencorship by calling it Misinformation, favour Faceless World unelected governance over National elected governance, subject to advisary foreign world law, Prefer Davos to Westminster, want the British public to be under the control of foreign unelected bueaucrats and judges, the state entitled to the majority of the fruits of you labour, encourages non wealth producers (public servants) over wealth producers (self emloyed who generate personal wealth) , much of your accumulated wealth belongs to the state on your death, ban anything they do not approve of (especially if people enjoy it) for Health and Safety reasons, support for Non crime hate offences, tolerate a Monarchy, tolerate The Church of England (and the Wee Frees) of whom the top CoE clerics are nearer to Cultural Marxism than Christianity. Tolerate a Free Market economy. You should preferably only send your child to a state controlled school but tolerate Private School especially for their own kids, They want to hand UK sovereignty to unelected problematical bodies of international control (ie The UN, EU, WEF, WHO, ECHR, ICC) Basically they are Snobs with contempt for us lumpen proletariat and despise our history, dumbing down the education of the Proletariat, Tolerate Rape Gangs so long as they vote Labour, the human rights of criminals and foreigners are more important than those of the victims and British nationals, Implementing Benign Socialism is a means of Socialists getting elected and control by deceipt and then using it as a stepping stone to enforce Toxic Socialiasm, The Socialists are serving sinister and opaque foreign masters not the British voters. Believe in ruling by consent so long as the proleariat agree with their opinions otherwise Governing Dictatorially. Prioritise Civil Servants over Self Employed, Generally the Socialists have a deep contempt for the Working Class who they consider to be too stupid to be involved in governing themselves. Pakistani Rape gangs are acceptable to Socialism for their votes and for their programme to change British society from British to Globalist Muliticulturalism. Expect others (the lumpen proletariat) to pay for their pet,(usually crackpot) plans, Multiculturalism and open borders imposed by them on the public without their vote. As the numbers of Muslims increase they will drop their support for Labour for their own Sharia politics – indeed it has started as there are now 5 Muslim MPs who have replaced the Labour MPs. Their first parliamentary action was to demand a Blasphemy Law in the UK for Islam.

Increases the income and conditions of working while at the same time increasing the cost of employing workers. More people out of work?

It is worth noting that even at the height of his powers Hitler, in 1941, never had more that 10% of German people in the Nazi Party. Is it possible that when the Muslim population reaches a critical level that an extreme and violent Islamic party will evolve in a similar manner to try to force UK into a Caliphate with Sharia law?

Can be summed up as Globalism. Starmer is a definately a Globalist Davos Man ( has said so on tv) not a UK First Man and as such will always show loyalty and preference to international interests when they conflict with UK interests. They are overtly arrogant with a shortage of common sense.

Then mission creep to —

Toxit Socialism — you cannot own any property, the state overty controls the education of your children, travel controlled by the state, No free speech only politically correct speech, no national governance only Globalism, the fruits of your labour belong the entirely to the state, a higher archy of Illuminnati, Nomenclatura and the lumpen proletariat, anti religion, You will have no accumulated wealth to pass on to your next of kin, No rival political parties allowed so only token elections, No Free market economy but a Command Economy, no self employed, no personal enjoyment. They will dine on fillet steak and caviar, Remove any Monarchy and hint of Empire, believe in ruling by coercion and command rather than consent with no input from the lumpen proletatiat . They want total unelected control of the UK and the world. Allow the industrial raping of young girls for the votes of the rapists.

They are overtly arrogant, with virtually no common sense and absolutely no humility. They are Orwell’s pigs wearing trousers?

Then mission creep to —

Communism in its various forms , Soviet Socialism, National Socialism, Globalism, Marxism, New World Order, World Economic Forum , World Health Organisation — Same as Toxic Socialism (but over the whole world) but much more so with Gulags or Corrective Labour Camps for any dissenters, depose any Monarchs and their families. Reduce the lumpen proletariats by several billion, complete state control over all the people and institutions of the world.

It would appear that the aim of the UK and world Political Illuminati is for the Caucasian population of the UK and Europe to be replaced by Coudenhove’s Mestizo people. The way to achieve this seems to be by mass immigration that the UK lumpen proletariate has had foisted on them without their agreement. Is the mass raping of little english girls, the blowing up of the Manchester Arena children, the continual stabbing of innocent Brits ‘et al’ mearly colateral damage in their journey to achieve this aim of our UK Illuminati? If the next group migrants included another Valdo Calocane is it worth the risk to the British public to let any of them in?

Soviet Socialism had their Holodomor that deliberately starved to death 5-10 million Russians and National Socialism had their Holocaust that murdered 5-9 million Jews and others. The common theme is toxic Socialism.

Socialism may be fine in theory but for some reason the wrong people always get in charge. – Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, PolPot, Mussoline, Merkel, Blair, Corbyn, Starmer, Biden, Xi Jinping, Putin, Tito, Kim Jong, Mao Zedong, Biden, Trudeau,

Starmer has some good speech writers but his delivery is awful and one seriously doubts his sincerity. His loyalty is not to the British people nor even the Labour voters but to Davos, his North London extreme left wing lawyer mates and the unelected international institutions.

Summary of present (2025) UK parties

Tory- Party split between Tories and those leaning towards Globalism (sort of Pinko Liberals – the TINOs Tory In Name Only?) with totally opposite policies. Tory Party not to be trusted until they rid themselves of their Globalist element. If the Tory party splits and the true Tories join with Reform which group will get the Tory party assets (the constituency houses and money)

Labour – Promise Benign Socialism and anything to get elected then implement Toxic Socialism – completely Globalist and not to be trusted

LiDem – Support any cause they think will get them votes. A protest party and effectively Labour light.

Reform – Beginning to look like the party of Common Sense and of the British Working population – Putting British people first’

Greens – A party of good intentions but of deluded policies and grossly overstate their case – Labour very light

The problem with International law and agencies (ie The WHO, ECHR,UN,ICC etc) is that whatever their altruistic motives when being set up they all eventually end being controlled by a toxic unelected and a remote bureaucratic Illiberal Elite. The Toxic Socialists with their Coudenhove Plan and the WEF and the UN is now unduly influenced by China and Islam.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.