New World Order, Nations, DEI and mass migration – Issue 2
The Globalist plan is to eliminate all nations for a single, worldwide nation with no borders and a single breed of humans and single culture.
This post may be a conspiracy theory or have much truth in it – for you to decide. If you disagree with any thing in this post please inform the editor with your evidence. If not please forward on to all your contacts.
We have a world view between Globalist Sovereignty and Nationalist Sovereignty. At the moment the Globalists hold sway by stealth and deceit but the nationalists are waking up. What is Globalism? – reading this post will give you an idea. Simply it is to eliminate individual Nations and their unique tribes for a worldwide single ‘nation’ with a single population. All property and people belong to the state and all politicians are remote and appointed. The opposite is the Open Free society where the fruits of your labour belong to you and you are entitled to own property as a Free Man with free speech. Existing nations to keep their own sovereignty and unique populations with their politicians elected who have real power. Generally the more left wing people are the more Globalist. However there are some closet Globalists in the Tory Party. The Labour Party ruling elite tend to be Globalists while their proletariat voters are generally Nationalists. Indeed it is more true now to consider the Labour Party a Fabian Party (see https://www.theeuroprobe.org/2025-007-the-labour-party-has-been-hijacked-by-the-fabian-society/)
Why are our politicians allowing, or even inviting, into UK vast numbers of migrants -legal and illegal (or not stopping them) and welcoming them with a red carpet and plenty of goodies? None of this was put to the British electorate for their approval so it surely cannot be legal. Basically the British people have voted into power a Globalist Socialist government of Fabian members whose remit is to achieve political control by stealth. The consequences are profound for the UK. They want to change our Englishness for a global culture.
Why is International Law so keen on preventing the UK deporting foreign criminals? Heed the words of Peter Southerland. – United Nations Special Representative on International Migration later in this post. It seems the aim of the United Nations is for migration to outnumber the English in England to remove the notion of Englishness.
When some stone age nomadic clans decided to settle in one place it was essential for them to have control of an area of land that contained all the resources necessary for their survival. However the nomads who had roamed those lands for years considered they still could and take whatever they wanted. The settlers did not take kindly to any rival clan entering ‘their’ land, taking any of those resources without their permission as they believed they now ‘owned’ those resources and that area of land. They were prepared to use extremely violent and brutal means to protect those resources. The start of the notion of people possessing property, the envy of those who did not have them and the start of violent conflict.
From then on competing clans of Caucasians have slaughtered each other in conflicts, mainly over possession of land and resources.
Some 30 – 40000 years ago a small group of people moved up through the Caucasus into what is now Russia. Most of Europe was then under a glacier over 1 mile + thick but inhabiting along the edge of the glacier were small groups of Neanderthals – just about surviving. An occasional Caucasian enterprising hunter would sometimes move west and meet up with them. When that glacier melted some 12000 years ago their descendants were then able to move west from Russia to occupy Europe as by then the Neanderthals had become extinct. They were to become the many tribes and Nations of Europe but they all cousins and had the same heritage from those first few from the Caucasus.
The vast open European space became ‘owned ‘ by various clans though often coveted by rival clans. Closely related clans then began to gather together to form tribes for the mutual protection of their land and resources. They began to evolve their own languages and cultures
Borders started to form to protect their assets as various other groups of clans began to challenge them for those assets. From those borders nations were formed.
This was the start of formally owning many possessions and serious conflict. From then on the Caucasians began to slaughter each other in earnest.
Sometime in the late Middle Ages an idea began to form that ownership of property leads to envy by those who do not have it then on to continual violent conflict. That slaughter and the concept that your Nation was better than all the others became regarded as not the way to live in peace. Over time that idea developed into a belief that all the Caucasians should give up their individual nations to become a single nation (the EU?) of happy people with no possessions therefore no fatal competition. However that is directly against very deeply rooted Human Nature.
In the 19th century Linnaeus and other scientists began to categorise everything and defined people into races by appearance. However, the discovery of DNA in mid 20th century made that definition more or less redundant. Very few people have homogenous DNA. Nearly all people have a major percentage of their nationality in their DNA but with minor percentages of many other nations; some may even have a trace of Neanderthal. We have evolved into many breeds of the same species. The New World Order (as it came to be called) proposal is that we become only one breed of humans.
This concept was put into print in 1924 by an Austrian politician Count Richard Coudenhove Kalergi in his book ‘Practical Idealism’ (available from Amazon). After the horrendous mass slaughter of WW1 he proposed that for Europe to be at peace with all people friends there should be mass immigration of African and Middle East people into Europe and all nations merged into one (is the EU’s first experiment with its ‘ever closer union’). The populations would then mix to form what he called a single Mestizo population to replace the many breeds of the Caucasian population. Everyone would then be happy, be docile and easy to control. No one will own any property, there will be no Nations, therefore no competition and all will be completely controlled by a self appointed illuminati and their nomenklatura. There are some hopeful UK politicians who clearly believe they should become part of the Illuminati.
This ideology has been taken up by several groups of self-opinionated and pretentious people who consider that they are the intelligent illuminati who should be in control. The 2-4 million migrants of the Boris wave are surely a preliminary to out numbering the indigenous British eventually by birthrate?
The future illuminati should have the unelected right to be in control of us, the lumpen proletariat, as we are too stupid to govern ourselves. The Club of Rome, the World Economic Forum (AKA The New World Order), international judiciary, UN, EU,The World Health Organisation, International Corporates etc. (see jacksotallaro. substack.com). It even trickles down to some members of parliaments who think it degrading to be subjected to having to be elected and have to account for their decisions. Are they hoping to join the illuminati?
Paul Henry Spaak, one of the founders of the EU, said ‘the way to achieve a politically integrated Europe is to initially pretend that it will be merely a Common Market – nothing more. (Fabian policy?) By the time the European people come to realise its true nature it will too late for them be able to change it’. Change by stealth?
Altierio Spinelli, another EU founder, said ‘The aim should be to slowly assemble the units of a supranational government by stealth and only declare its purpose at the end of the process by declaring a constitution.’ The same stealth and deceit?
The remit of the EU is ‘ever closer union’ and the removal of separate Nations of Europe. Starting with the Schengen free movement across the EU. i.e. the ending of national frontiers and nations.
The EU (and UN) took up Coudenhove’s plan post WWII and issue a Coudenhove prize every 2nd year for politician or bureaucrat who has furthered his plan. Coudenhove was the first recipient of that prize. The EU have also had meetings with the North African states to consider combining to form a new single state of Eurabia, also called Eurafrica, (the Barcelona Declaration https://www.theeuroprobe.org/2016-081-the-barcelona-declaration-treaty-for-the-destruction-of-the-european-people/). There would be free movement between them to mix the populations – but without consulting their populations.
Burnhams free movement with the EU is part of a plan to remove the UK border with the EU and join their desire to eliminate the Nations of Europe for a single nation of Europe and a single Mestizo people .
A page from the World Economic Forum book of Klaus Schwab where they want to get rid of several billion humans (including all the English?)
UK broke away from the EU thus spoiling the Coudenhove plan
Screenshot
Could this be the reason for our Globalist governments to give millions of migrants Leave to Remain and British Citizenship. Are they using the claim that immigration is good for the economy to hide the Globalist elimination of the English and achieve Sutherland’s aim? The need for migants to work in our NHS should be to give them as a 5 year working visa. They then return to their homeland for a couple of years before getting anoher 5 year working visa.
So it seems that it is the Remit of the Globalist United Nations is to destroy England and the English ??? One can reasonably speculate that our Home Office and many of our senior politicians also agree with the United Nations???? Sutherland is now dead but the UN does not appear to have revoked his statement. Is it the unspoken aim of our government,the UN and Home Office to deliberately insert mass migration into our communities and use the migrant crisis as a convenient vehicle to achieve Coudenhove’s plan to change our country and population?
Why are the UN only advocating diversity in Caucasian countries?
It should be remembered that if a person is at risk in their own country they can seek asylum in an other country. However it is on the assumption that when their country is safe they will return back. The aim now seems that all asylum seekers will be given leave to remain in the UK permanently. No problem for one or two but a serious problem when there are thousands. What our politicians are doing is giving the asylum seekers indefinite leave to remain or settled status even when it is safe for them to return- even giving them UK citizenship. This further helps to achieve Sutherland’s plan of destroying the England we know?
It is also almost certain that the UN and EU have the same fate instore for Ireland and all the other European Nations except possibly Poland and Hungary who seem to be aware of this? HMOs and migrant camps is effective in reducing the ownership of the UK by the British.
Angele Merkel and Tony Blair implemented Coudenhove’s plan for Europe and the UK “to make their countries initially diverse and so better places”??? The people of EU and UK were never consulted, much less voted for it but it has been taken up by our establishments and their institutions never the less. Boris Johnson invited millions into the UK without the UK lumpen proletariats agreeing. However the uninformed general public are reported by much of the Media to be highly delighted with the outcome, apart for a few bigots who understand what is happening. The root of the mass migration into the EU and UK and why foreigners have to be given preferential treatment to native Brits is to achieve the Coudenhove and UN plan. Is this also the unspoken aim of our Cabinet Politicians because it looks very much like it is?
Andy Burnham now wants to have Free Movement with the EU to allow potentially 2-3 million Europeans into the UK to take the jobs of the unemployed British. Worse is the EU requirement that theUK will have to take one or two million migrants- perhaps even more of their 35 million migrants. Even more will have the right to migrate to UK.
The ECHR is now a major problem. When we signed up to it in 1951 it had 12 very experienced judges to deal with the displaced persons and the abuse of human rights in the 1930s and 40s. In 2025 there are 47, many of whom seem to be appointed on political grounds not on their legal expertise with many from the EU. The ECHR has self extended its Remit far beyond its 1951 Remit so it is no longer what we signed up to.
With mass immigration we now have a situation where someone born a British citizen has to wait 18 years until they can vote but a newly arrived migrant only has to wait 5 years??? DEI is also another way of reducing native Brits ownership of Britain. Housing unknown migrants in Houses of Multiple Occupancy within UK communities without consulting them is enforced and unwanted integration. So is moving 1000+ migrant men into small communities and allowing them free access to those communities. Any women and girls there who get attacked are just collateral damage. What better way of achieving the United Nations goal of out numbering the English in their own country?
The Lumpen Proletariat will have to put up with the migrants until we accept them as a permanent and integral part of our community. Some 50% of all our social houses have been given to newly arrived immigrants when there are thousands of British families homeless who have been on the waiting list for years. An excellent way of enforcing Coudenhove’s plan. Against the locals wishes but the illuminati clearly want to eventually enforce the Coudenhove plan everywhere whether we lumpen proletariats like it or not. The Home Office are to give the migrants free condoms. Surely an admission by them that the migrants will rape British women and girls who will just be collateral damage in the desire for a diverse country?
It seems that the Labour Party are considering a similar scheme to the post war Billeting Act for discharged troops as so many houses had been bombed. You will be visited by a government official and if you have a spare room you will have to house a migrant – indefinitely ??? – voluntary at first but eventually mission creep means you will have no choice. With the Coudenhove plan it is first necessary to degrade British culture so Coudenhove can replace it. DEI is promoted as a process to ensure equality but its application is nearly always to the disadvantage of the British. British culture and history is continually mocked, derided and rewritten. Surely the prioritising of migrants for social housing when there are British on the waiting list is a way to help reduce the British ownership of Britain?
The British culture of free speech is being prevented by calling it hate speech to shut up the proletariat. The almost meaningless accusation of racist is hurled at any normal citizen for however minor a deviation from the Globalist narrative
International Lawfare makes it almost impossible to return migrant criminals to their home country so that degrades the UK further to achieve Coudenhove’s plan. There are now some very busy activists proposing full amnesty for all migrants to reduce the British content of the UK further.
Are the British citizens being blown up, raped, stabbed and murdered by some of these migrants just merely acceptable collateral damage in the movement to achieve the Coudenhove plan? Not to mention the raping of young vulnerable girls on an industrial scale being tolerated for the sake of votes. It is clear that in the UK the illuminati now consider the Muslims right of Pakistani Muslim men to rape young girls over rides the human rights of little girls not to be raped. If all the Muslims had not been allowed to move into the UK by the Tories all those Brits would still be alive and the girls not raped even if it meant that non lethal reasonable Muslims were not allowed in? Is this all just a means to an end?
It seems that our police chiefs are effectively at war with the British lumpen proletariat to help achieve this. When the proletariat have cause to demonstrate they are met by police in quasi military dress and a shield wall. When non Brits or WOKE Brits demonstrate they are met by police in shirt sleeves offering cakes and drinks and dancing the Macarena. The police chiefs are now selected from brainwashed graduates that agree with this and given accelerated promotion. The foot soldier police have to go along with it to keep their jobs. The quality of facilities in the Military barracks refurbished for the migrants far exceeds those in your average British sports club. That cannot be chance. It has to be a deliberate policy of the Home Office.
The final result is that our Globalist political elite and self acclaimed moral guardians think they are the intelligent ones and we lumpen proletariats are just plain stupid. We are just ill-informed.
However it is interesting to speculate that could the Globalist EU and UK political elite be complicit with (or tolerate them and refuse to stop them) the smuggling gangs and the legal migrants to achieve population change? Current and past UK governments have gone to great lengths to bring into the UK many millions of non British people. Do they wish UK to achieve the Globalist State of one Mestizo people, who own no property and have no free speech, can be fined for any petty offence or non criminal ‘hate’ speech? . I only ask. As the old saying goes – if it walks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck it is, in all probability, a duck.
One can also wonder at the real reason the Tories (and others) invited 10 million foreigners into the UK. Was it to help to replace our population? A way for the Tory party to prove that was not the reason is to remove those millions of migrants they brought into the UK without the agreement of the voters.
For you to decide if this post is a conspiracy theory or is this what is actually going behind our backs.
