Category Archives: Uncategorized

2017 – 059 Operation Mockingbird

Operation Mockingbird is a covert project to gain control of the worlds media.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation Mockingbird

The Main Stream Media have a fairly common generally left wing bias – particularly TV. The Soviets claim to have been able to insert Marxist journalists into most of the worlds media.  The BBC is a classic. Several of their senior political commentators were certainly Marxists when at Uni. There are reputed to be some 600 Common Purpose alumni in positions of authority in the BBC. Common Purpose is a crypto Marxist training college that teaches its alumni on how to administer outside of the democratic process.

However Social Media has given ordinary people a world wide voice outside of government control who were otherwise denied exposure. The Establishment are desperately trying to gain control of this ‘dangerous’ media that is out of their control.

Mockingbird is a very little known project reputed to be started by the CIA in the ’50s. It seems now to have been taken on by the UN and the New World Order. More info from the inside is needed.

It is very likely an integral part of the preparations for the New World Order. To understand what that means read ‘New World Order’ by Mark Dice – available in Amazon.

2017 – 058 THE HISTORY AND AIMS OF THE EU, UN and New World Order

             THE HISTORY AND AIMS OF THE EU

“BRAVE NEW EUROPE?”

The Origins of the EU from Paris in 1870 to Berlin in 1942 to Strasbourg in 1944 to Brussels in 1957 to Berlin in 1964 and what the EU intentions are for the future as part of  The New World Order.

This not a normal book with a flowing narrative. It is a compilation of relevant articles, comments and quotes combining like pieces of a jigsaw that fit together to give the whole picture.

Mick Greenhough was a committee member of the Leave.eu campaign. During that time he was dismayed at how uninformed the majority of both Remainers and Brexiteers were about the true nature of the EU.

click here    http://www.shieldcrest.co.uk/mick-greenhough.html for a copy

The reporting by BBC and the mainstream media has been, and still is, woefully inadequate and thoroughly biased both pre and post the referendum. Brexit exaggerated somewhat but Remain was riddled with inaccuracies, fabrications and gross unsubstantiated speculation.

Continue reading

2017 – 057 The National Society for the prevention of Cruelty to Vegetables

Meat Marketing Board                           Mick Greenhough

Milton Keynes

National Society of Prevention of Cruelty to Vegetables

1982

Dear Mr Clapham,

I would like to put a few ideas to you for your consideration.

Firstly to put them in historical context. My first wife became involved with a group of FemiNazies when she was taking a degree in Sociology at Goldsmiths College in 1977. They then took off for Greenham Common in 1981 and became ‘Wimmin’. Strangely they also became vegetarians (Veggies) and some were really very aggressive about it too. It was at that time I formed the National Society of Prevention of Cruelty to Vegetables. The object was initially to mock them into giving a rational reason why they objected to killing animals to eat but were quite at ease killing vegetables (The Veg). I can tell you that their lack of logic was equalled only by their lack of humour.

A few of the aspects I tried to engage them in discussing are listed below (without much success I might add, as their reasoning powers were somewhat limited and their minds completely closed), plus a few more developed since;

You are what you eat – that’s why Veggies seem to end up with brains like cabbages. You only have to talk very briefly with a Veggie to realize how narrow minded, prejudiced, bigoted and intolerant one becomes due to the lack of good, red meat. We, as human beings, are all born equal. The only difference between Veggies and normal people is the lack of meat in their diet. Medical research is continually revealing just how much diet effects our mental stability so it is very difficult to avoid the blindingly obvious conclusion that the lack of meat in your diet turns you barmy.

The Veg have rights too – a potato has as much right to life as a lamb or calf. Just because a potato’s eyes are not soft and brown like a calf that’s no excuse to gouge theirs out, flay it alive and mash it up. How do you know that a potato has no soul?

Continue reading

2017 – 055 The Spanish experience with the EU

 Do you remember how we were told, again and again, in the EU referendum, that the European Union is a great force for peace? In case we doubted that – as, let’s be honest, we did – there was the evidence of it having recently won the Nobel Peace Prize to prove it.

For many years I have regarded Spanish politicians as the most shortsighted of a shortsighted breed (politicians, that is, not Spaniards!) because, in their understandable desire to cement their recently achieved democracy, they had an overwhelming desire to ‘belong’ to every international organisation going. In return for bucket-loads of taxpayers’ cash, principally from the United Kingdom and Germany, Spain bought in to the EU project more than any other western European country. Jeremy Clarkson was famously filmed at a Spanish motorway toll booth refusing to pay the toll because, being British, he said that he had already paid for it; he had a point!

In return for our cash – £billions of it – Spanish politicians embraced the EU as though they had just won top prize in the EuroMillions lottery. To all intents and purposes, they had done precisely that. Like politicians across the continent, they revelled in the Brussels and Strasbourg gravy train and enjoyed the boost to their egos and the 5-star hotels that went with EU summit meetings.

What they foolishly failed to see – or, more likely, chose to ignore – was that every move the EU made was about undermining the nation state. Here in the UK it was easy enough to spot this: EU passports, EU flags, the supremacy of EU law, the burgeoning EU army and gendarmerie, EU Presidents galore, the bloated EU Foreign Ministry and diplomatic corps. It didn’t take a genius to work out that the EU project was all about the destruction of the nation state.

Nationalist politicians in Scotland, Wales and, yes, Catalonia, were not slow to spot this. Were they genuine in their claims to want independence, they would, of course, have sought to leave the EU, so that they could become masters of their own destiny, rather than vassals of Brussels. Why then did Salmond, Sturgeon and their counterparts in Wales, Catalonia and elsewhere embrace EU rule with such fanatical enthusiasm? It can only be because they had the sense to realise that the EU was doing their work for them – destroying the nation states they sought to leave.

Rajoy and the rest of the Spanish political elite have now been hoist by their own petard; their beloved EU has brought Spain to the brink of dissolution. They were too happy accepting EU handouts to see what was happening until it was too late. Now their country is in crisis, while Lombardy and Veneto, to name but a few, look on with interest, seeing opportunities to loosen their ties to Rome. Ironically, it is the Treaty of Rome that may reverse the unification Italy achieved in the 19th century.

As Lord Tebbit warned many years ago, by denying its people any outlet for democratic protest, the EU is sowing the seeds of its own destruction. It is undermining national identity, undermining Nato – in fact it is undermining the very core values it purports to uphold. It is an idea whose time has past.

Hardly a day goes by without the BBC telling us that Brexit is a disaster which must be reversed; the truth is quite the opposite. The crisis in Spain, the success of Eurosceptic political parties in Germany and Austria and Macron’s plans for a bigger EU army and more powers for Brussels – all are evidence that Brexit is no longer just desirable, but essential. Now, more than ever, we shall be Better Off Out.

Simon Richards
http://www.tfa.net/

2017 – 054 The very serious threat of the EU army having control in UK post Brexit

EU to treat UK like Spain is treating Catalonia?

2017 – 053 Was Randolf Churchill hoodwinked by Bromley Council?

Dear RAF Chapel Interested Parties,

 
In an open letter primarily directed towards the RAF community, Randolph Churchill, great grandson of Winston Churchill and Patron of the BHMM Trust, has accused Rita Radford and myself, David Evans, instigators of the 38 Degrees Petition to Protect the Biggin Hill Memorial Chapel, of deceiving signatories into believing that the entire Chapel is being demolished by the London Borough of Bromley.
 
The BHMM scheme has many contentious aspects, the demolition of the Vestry, the unacceptable design of the Museum building to replace the Vestry, the closure of the Chapel for over a year, and the loss of the St George’s Room to become part of the Museum, to mention just four.  Rather than admit that this is, as stated by Cambridge Professor of Architecture Gavin Stamp, ‘a bad divisive scheme’, the BHMM Trust have influenced  Randolph Churchill to make this undignified claim, without providing the reader with any proof.  The Petition is rightly named ‘Protect’ the Biggin Hill Chapel – against the plans of the London Borough of Bromley who now own the Chapel and are hell bent on ‘bulldozing’ their scheme through, against the wishes of currently 21,000 + signatories.

Continue reading

2017 – 052 EU press card to control all journalists

The European Union (EU) has proposing issuing an EU Press Card (EUPC) and to accredit journalists.

 

This will be to replace the existing International Federation of Journalists Card that is already universally accepted for a journalist to operate within the EU.

 

The accreditation and issuing of EUPCs will be controlled by the unelected European Commission (EC). They will decide who can and who cannot be an accredited journalist and who they will allow to have an EUPC.

 

If the journalist does not report all the activities of the EU in a very positive manner acceptable to the EC then the EC will have the legal right to confiscate their EUPC. The journalist will not then be able to work and report within the EU.

Continue reading

2017 – 051 Hammond blocking Brexit

Continue reading

2017 – 050 How the EU is leading the UK into a negotiating quick sand

Martin Howe has given Article 50 a forensic treatment.
It underscores what we already knew, namely that the Article 50 route for the EU was nothing less than a trap for the UK – or perhaps more aptly given developments recently, could be called an area of lethal quicksand.

It starkly reveals how the “transition” not only enables us to leave the EU in name only  after March 2019, but that we would be involved in extremely complex  and unnecessary arrangements open to more protracted disputes which could possibly delay almost indefinitely a real Brexit   (in spite of Mrs May’s repeated assurances about “leave means leave & etc”)

In my view this is a hugely important piece, though long is worth reading and understanding the basic message –  it is a noose being prepared for the UK and given enough rope, we know what our devious political class are capable of.
If you would kindly circulate this to your list then it would do a great service in providing a sound analysis of  the acute  danger we face from the ‘remainers’ by one of the best legal minds today in the UK  on matters EU.  (some of the emphases in bold are mine below)

In this first part of his analysis of the legal and treaty ramifications of the Florence speech ‘implementation period’ proposal, Martin Howe QC explains that:
The EU only has the legal power under Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union to agree transitional or interim arrangements once the destination to which the transition leads has been agreed, at least as a framework. There is no power under Article 50 for the EU to agree an open ended transitional period of the kind which many business leaders seem to expect in order to allow time for negotiation about the future relationship.

Because the EU cannot agree to a transitional period until the framework of the future relationship has been agreed, it is impossible for the EU to agree to a transitional period until late 2018 at the earliest. Hopes that such a transition can be agreed ‘by the end of this year’ are naive and totally unrealistic.

Continue reading

2017 – 049 Driving Awareness course – poor and dangerous advice

2017 – 048 The sinister EU Defense Union.

Major General Julian Thompson 

In the heady days after the Brexit vote, those who had cast their ballot in favour of leaving the EU might have been forgiven for believing that the decision was made. Alea iacta est, as Caesar said when crossing the Rubicon. The die is cast. As it turns out, in modern military matters, sucIt has taken some time for Whitehall to settle with clarity on what Brexit means in a number of areas. Only now are mandarins finally absorbing that it is necessary to leave the Single Market and the Customs Union. But I rather fear that there is another union where the nettle has not been grasped, because the EU also has a Defence Union issues have proved to be far from certain.

It has taken some time for Whitehall to settle with clarity on what Brexit means in a number of areas. Only now are mandarins finally absorbing that it is necessary to leave the Single Market and the Customs Union. But I rather fear that there is another union where the nettle has not been grasped, because the EU also has a Defence Union.

At present it is rather skeletal. But it is very real; and the principle behind a skeleton is that you hang things off it. In EU terms, that is done as part of a slow and steady process. Paradoxically, if anything, Defence Union has accelerated after Brexit. In part, but only in part, that can be put down to the kneejerk response by the EU to push down on the accelerator in times of crisis. That’s how mothballed Justice and Home Affairs policy suddenly re-emerged as core EU treaty material after 9/11 and ‘something had to be done’ by EU mandarins.

Continue reading

2017 – 047 Brave New Europe?

 

              THE HISTORY AND AIMS OF THE EU

“BRAVE NEW EUROPE?”

The Origins of the EU from Paris in 1870 to Berlin in 1942 to Strasbourg in 1944 to Brussels in 1957 to Berlin in 1964 and what the EU intentions are for the future.   

Continue reading

2017 – 046 EU intentions for Acquiring all Copyright  on the death of the owner.

EU intentions for Copyright                   by  Mick Greenhough   0780 134 1476           mickgreenhough@yahoo.co.uk

 

This has been confirmed by the leader of the Independence and Democracy Group in the European Parliament.

There is a European Commission (EC) committee currently sitting to produce an EU Directive – ‘The Status of Artists in Europe’ – that they hope will enable the EC to take control of all artistic activities in Europe. This Directive will be the cause of major consequences for artists and authors- initially for conditions of work but also for copyright when fully implemented.

At first glance this proposed EU Directive would seem to be a very good advance for artists. As with most EU Directives it is not what it at first appears. There will be a very nasty covert sting in the tail.

The interim draft has been published – 2006/2249(INI) 20.3.2007 – but a very significant item from the committee discussions have been omitted.

The following are still being worked on but basically the EC committee, chaired by a Claire Gibault with the support other very Arty Socialist MEPs, want the (unelected) European Commission to:

Continue reading

2017 – 045 Desecration of Biggin Hill Memorial Chapel

More

Please keep your emails going to the Heritage Lottery Fund (who are financing this travesty) and also Bromley Council. But now please copy in Historic England as well.

I know some of you have received ‘nonsense’ replies from the London Borough of Bromley. If you have any doubts about what we have said, please google the official Historic England Listing for the Memorial Chapel, Entry No 1391588. The detailed description of the North Chapel or Vestry starts: ‘The large Chapel to the N is detailed in a more complex way….’ The ‘oculus’ it then goes on to mention is the Air Crew Association stained glass window.

The Chapel has only been listed once, that being in 2005 and the Listing is for the COMPLETE building, comprising the Main Chapel, the St George’s Room and the Vestry, which is a fine brick building designed by acclaimed Architects Purcell Miller Tritton. It covers some 70 square metres, the largest component of which is described on the plans as the ‘Choir Vestry’. It was completed at the time of the 50th Anniversary of the Battle of Britain and was built because it had been noted that the Chapel was lacking in its facilities and it incorporates a small boiler room to make the Chapel independent heating wise. The complete Chapel is ‘modern’ in Listed Building terms, as it is all post war, and demolition of the Vestry is part demolition of the Listed building.

Continue reading

2017 – 044 A German view of Islam

A German’s View on Islam – worth reading

This is by far the best  explanation of the Muslim terrorist situation I have ever read.  His references to past history are accurate and clear.  Not long, easy to understand, and well worth the read. The  author of this email is Dr. Emanuel Tanya, a well-known  and well-respected psychiatrist.
A man, whose family was German aristocracy prior to World War II, owned a number of large industries and estates. When asked how many German people were true Nazis, the answer he gave can guide our attitude toward fanaticism.

‘Very few people were true Nazis,’ he said, ‘but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come. My family lost everything. I ended up in a concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories.’

We are told  again and again by ‘experts’ and ‘talking heads’ that Islam is  the religion of peace and that the vast majority of Muslims  just want to live in peace. Although this unqualified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff, meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the spectre of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam.

The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history. It is the fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars worldwide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honour-kill. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals.  It is the fanatics who teach their young to kill and to become suicide bombers.

The hard, quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the ‘silent majority,’ is cowed and extraneous.
Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who  just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists  were responsible for the murder of about 20 million people.  The peaceful majority were irrelevant.. China ‘s huge population  was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million people.

Continue reading

2017 – 043 Political Correctness is about control not etiquette

PC Is About Control, Not Etiquette

TAGS Media and CulturePhilosophy and MethodologyPolitical Theory

12/28/2015Jeff Deist

2017 – 042 Christopher Booker The monstous folly of the Green Blob.

From killer diesel fumes to ruinous floods, every green initiative imposed on us by politicians has ended in disaster… and this is the great folly of our age, says CHRISTOPHER BOOKER

By Christopher Booker For The Daily Mail

Published: 23:53, 7 April 2017 | Updated: 01:50, 8 April 2017

What a parable for our times the great diesel scandal has been, as councils vie to see which can devise the heaviest taxes on nearly half the cars in Britain because they are powered by nasty, polluting diesel.

This week, it was announced many diesel drivers will soon have to pay fully £24 a day to drive into Central London, while 35 towns across the country are thinking of following suit. Already some councils charge up to £90 more for a permit to park a diesel car.

The roots of this debacle go back to the heyday of Tony Blair’s government, when his chief scientific adviser, Sir David King, became obsessed with the need to fight global warming.

Continue reading

2017 – 040 The 1971 FCO 30/1048: Heath knew it was treason

FCO 30/1048: Heath knew it was treason

 

This classified government document dated April 1971 remained secret until it was released under the 30 year rule. It proves Heath’s government knew the 1972 EEC Treaty would lead to the loss of sovereignty, and was therefore treason. They had a stunningly accurate picture of the EU, which never was the EEC (an Economic Community), expecting Britain to be abolished after the turn of the century.

The authors, all civil servants or ministers, are very pro EU, their intent is clearly to conceal the loss of sovereignty. But they understood perfectly it would all be abolished.

In public Heath’s government all lied the treaty would not affect our sovereignty.  This includes Douglas Hurd, still an active senior Conservative, who is also both a liar and a traitor, a point we put to him at the Conservative Conference in Blackpool. He assured us his connections in the legal profession would ensure he was never convicted.

 

Here are just a few of the damning sentences:

Continue reading

2017 – 039 The folly of electric cars

  • Here’s Why Electric Cars Are Useless

  • by Philip Foster

Range, on the flat, just over 200 miles in summer. In winter lucky to get 100 miles. And in winter – no heating!

To suggest, as some ignorant people have, that electric cars ‘emit no CO2’ is absurd because the power stations that charge them do. To charge an electric vehicle (such as a Tesla), just once, requires the burning of 43 kilogram of coal.

A petrol car will require about 20 kilogram of petrol for the same distance. It follows that the electric car is emitting more than twice the CO2 of a petrol car.

Here are the sums:

Drax uses about 0.31 kilogram of coal per KWhr generated.

1 A Tesla battery is rated at 70 KWhr and fast charging is only 50% efficient. It will need 140 KWhr of electricity for a single charge; this works out as about 43 kilogram (0.31 × 140) of coal for a full charge.

Continue reading

2017 – 038 Is the EU Democratic?

Is the EU Democratic?

The BBC continually describes the EU as democratic. Well, is it?

What is the difference between a police state and a democratic state?

 An Oligarchic/Police State

  • An Oligarch of an unelected ‘Elite’ who are effectively the ‘State’.
  • Any elected parliament has no power.
  • System run by a complicit Civil Service.
  • No criticism of the State permitted.
  • The State controls all social activities.
  • Press and media controlled by the State.
  • Police answerable to the State.
  • Citizens monitored by State Security.
  • Police can arrest anyone without needing a warrant or evidence.
  • All citizens required to carry an ID card.
  • Local informers report on neighbours.
  • Citizens are guilty until they can prove their innocence.

A Democratic State

  • Citizens can stand for any political position and vote for any party.
  • The Civil Service is strictly neutral.
  • Vote by secret ballot to remove or keep the government of the day.
  • The government is required to give a truthful answer to any question.
  • Citizens are innocent until proven guilty and arrested only with a warrant.
  • Police and judiciary independent of government.
  • Press and media free from government control.
  • Citizens have freedom of speech, movement and religion.

Comparison of an Oligarchic/Police State with the EU Continue reading

2017 – 037 UK Law vs EU Law

MALLOCH: The Common Law and Brexit

2017 – 036 Free Speech

see  http://www.going-postal.net/2017/08/free-speech-by-godfrey-bloom.html

An excellent resume by Godfrey Bloom.

2017 – 035 Brave New Europe? Amazon reviews

Amazon reviews for Brave New Europe?   http://www.shieldcrest.co.uk/mick-greenhough.html

For a list of the essential reading appendices  go to  http://www.theeuroprobe.org/2016-050-issue-3/

Reviews

ByJonathan Nicholas – AuthorTOP 1000 REVIEWERon 25 August 2017

5 stars

Hard hitting no holds barred account of the real EU. It is astonishing after reading this that the vote to leave was even allowed let alone won. It now seems miraculous. But so fortunate for the British that we are now – hopefully – going to exit the failed political project that the EU has become. Great reading, thought provoking and well written. Recommended.

Continue reading

2017 – 034 More on Cultural Marxism and the Frankfurt School

Political Correctness: Social Engineering Via Weaponising Language – rga

Political Correctness: Social Engineering Via Weaponising Language

Political Correctness – or “PC” as it has become known, is a relatively new phenomenon that has grown exponentially year-on-year, infecting each new generation of young minds worse than the previous generation.  It is a social virus [#1], designed by Marxists to spread like a cancer and help them rot a societies culture from within.  Political Correctness = Cultural Marxism.  PC is what we in the West have, instead of religion, and its adherents share the same behaviours as the worst zealots – where belief trumps reason and dogma beats fact.  Its primary weapons are slander and censorship.

political correctness voltaire

THE FRANKFURT SCHOOL

Frankfurt school building

In the 1920s, the vast majority of Marxist-influenced academics where in Europe and America.  They had expected that a war would cause the Workers to rise up, and rule in a Marxist Revolution, expecting this to spread after the Bolshevik uprising in Russia. When the ‘Communist uprising’ did not spread, two leading lights (Gramsci and Adorno) came to the same conclusion: A Revolution could not be guaranteed success (or to last, if it were successful) – if based only on Traditional Marxism; Western society was too ingrained with Christianity and the traditional values that it espoused, that the culture had to be changed first – before the Revolution could take root.  Therefore – Christianity and traditional values must be destroyed.  This is Cultural Marxism.

Continue reading

2017 – 033 Brave New Europe Amazon reviews

See http://www.shieldcrest.co.uk/mick-greenhough.html

And go to Amazon – Books – Brave New Europe? – Star rating – see reviews – write a review.

Reviews

ByG.F.REAKESon 8 July 2017

Excellent book for giving an over view of the evil EU project. Have bought 3 copies for avowed Europhiles who knew nothing of the machinations to deceive the British people. Not one Europhile I have ever met knows of ” Corpus Juris”

ByDavidon 23 June 2017

Continue reading