So who was the Father of the EU?
For the whole story read http://www.theeuroprobe.org/2018-030-the-history-and-aims-of-the-eu-and-new-world-order/
1922 – Richard Coudenhove Kalergi with his Pan European Movement and book ‘Praktischer Idealismus’ where he wanted Europe to be flooded with people from Africa and Arabia. He wanted to replace the white Caucasians by crossbreeding to form a Mestizo race as they will then be more docile and easier to control. (his words not mine). Post War the EU and later the UN took up his proposals and he was the first recipient of the EU’s biannual Coudenhove prize. A prize for the politician or bureaucrat who has made a contribution to furthering the EU’s Coudenhove plan.
1933 – Sir Arthur Salter with his book ‘The United States of Europe and other papers’. Wrote the book but did nothing about it except stimulate Jean Monnet.
1933 – Jean Monnet. A close friend of Salter and he campaigned fervently for the United States of Europe, got the Treaty of Rome and the Coal and Steel Community which were precursors to the EU proper. He was pipped in the 1964 committee by Hallstein for the father of the EU. The EU have given him the accolade of Father of the EU to hide the fact the the true father was a top Nazi. However he was more than happy with the 1964 version that was agreed. He was aided by Paul Henri Spaak a Belgian Marxist and Alterio Spinelli an Italian Marxist (with his Ventotene Manifesto). It seems that post war the surviving Nazis and European Marxists came together for their mutual benefit as both wanted an Authoritarian, undemocratic EU.
1942 – Germany was convinced it would win the war. Walther Funk’s committee produced a manual Europaische Wirtschafts Gemeinsschaft (roughly translates as The European Economic Community – rather prophetic?) on how Germany would run Europe post war. It was to become the first draft of the EU in 1964. A thoroughly unpleasant man who although he spent the war behind a desk he was sentenced to life imprisonment at the Nuremberg trials. However he had a good chum Walter Hallstein who will appear later.
In 1944 SS obergruppenfurhrer Dr Sheid laid out how Germany should prepare for losing the war but winning the peace. A very high up SS officer who organised the stripping of all the treasuries of the subject nations controlled by the Nazis to hide that looted wealth outside of Germany. That vast wealth was later used by Hallstein to overwhelm the other 4 countries on the 1964 committee who were destitute having had all their wealth looted by Dr Sheid in 1944/5 and Ludwig Erhard used it post war to regenerate German Industry (The German Miracle)
1964 Walter Hallstein, though he never joined the Nazi party he was a very high up member of the IG Farben/Nazi wartime coalition and one of Hitler’s top Lawyers. A chum of Walther Funk. He became chairman of the 1964 committee to plan the EU and was the first President of the new EU (how he achieved that is a matter of conjecture) . He hijacked the EU for Germany using Funk’s EWG manual for the first draft of the EU. As such he can truly claim to be the Father of the EU. He was not short of cash to enable him to control that committee. For Hallstein’s full CV go to https://www.dr-rath-foundation.org/2016/06/the-hidden-nazi-background-of-walter-hallstein-founding-president-of-the-brussels-eu-commission/
IG Farben was a conglomerate of German Industrial and Chemical Corporates. They formed a coalition with the Nazi party. Such coalitions are the basis of Fascism and were very anti Capitalism.
In 1939 Hallstein gave a speech where he emphasised the importance of “The Law for the Protection of the German Blood and the German Honor” Original manuscript of his speech in Rostock, 1939 (link: http://www.profit-over-life.org/books/books.php?book=54) profit-over-life.org/books/books.ph… Translation can be read here: (link:
Hallstein’s speech at the 1939 Rostock meeting.
Take your pick as to who you think was the Father of the EU.
My choice is Hallstein who the EU want to write out of history.
The men shown in this picture are:
The German Delegates to the 1964 committee to start the EU
- EU Commission President Walter Hallstein – the boss of the “Brussels EU”.
- German Chancellor Ludwig Erhard. a brilliant economist
- Ludger Westrick, Head of the German Chancellery.
- Karl Carstens, German Secretary of State for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
- Karl-Günther von Hase, Head of the Press and Information Service of the German government.
It is worth repeating that all 5 were very high ranking and active members of the I G Farben/ Nazi Coalition during WWII though not all Nazi Party members.
What were their backgrounds? To quote from EUfacts:
- Walter Hallstein, Hitler’s top German lawyer, was appointed the founding president of the so-called EU Commission, the highest body within the “Brussels EU.” In 1964, when this meeting took place, he had already been the chief architect of the “Brussels EU” construct for seven years. Hallstein, not legitimized by any democratic vote anywhere in Europe, ruled like a “tsar” – imposed by the successors of the IG Farben oil and drug cartel – over an army of 3,000 administrative servants in Brussels and a budget of billions of Euros (in today’s currency).
Before and during WWII Hallstein had served the Nazi regime as a fervent advocate of Nazi law, including at the University of Rostock, Germany. In January 23, 1939, three years after his Nazi law colleagues had issued the Nuremberg racial laws – and only months before the Nazi/IG Farben coalition launched WWII by attacking Poland – Hallstein talked about future European law under German leadership (“Rechtseinheit Großdeutschlands”). He left no doubt to whom his loyalty belonged, saying that: “One of the most important laws (in Nazi occupied European countries) is the protection Law for German blood and honour.” He chaired the committee to start the EU in 1964 and later became the first president of the EU.
In 1939 Hallstein gave a speech where he emphasised the importance of “The Law for the Protection of the German Blood and the German Honor” Original manuscript of Nazi propaganda speech in Rostock, 1939 http://www.profit-over-life.org/books/books.php?book=54) profit-over-life.org/books/books.ph… Translation can be read here: http://www.reject-the-eu.co.uk/info/hallstein-conquest-speech.html) reject-the-eu.co.uk/info/hallstein…
- Ludwig Erhard had been an economic consultant to the Nazi/IG Farben-coalition. He was founder and head of the Nazi-financed “Institut für Industrieforschung” (“Institute for Industry Research”) from 1942. Erhard was never a committed Nazi member but as an exceptionally gifted economist he was useful to them. Had he not gone along with the Nazis he would have probably ended up in a concentration camp.
After World War II, Erhard became an economic consultant to the Allied forces and later to the Minister of Economic Affairs and Chancellor in post-war Germany. He was then a member of the Christian Democratic Party (CDU). In his functions, he was responsible for the reintegration of the IG Farben managers sentenced in Nuremberg for crimes against humanity into leading corporate positions in post-war Germany. None of them expressed any remorse for the thousands of their forced laborers who suffered indescribably and the thousands who died. It was he who was instrumental in the recovery of German industry.
One of those to be “reintegrated” was BAYER’s WWII director Fritz Ter Mer. This executive of the world’s largest pharmaceutical (!) company was convicted at the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal No. VI – for genocide in connection with the deadly human experiments with patented Bayer drugs in KZ Auschwitz (www.profit-over-life.org). With the help of Erhard – then Germany’s Minister of Economic Affairs – Ter Mer was released from prison and reinstated as the chairman of the board of BAYER by 1956.
Erhard publicly defended such an unspeakable act by stating that the selection of Germany’s post-war industry captains was necessary because of their “expertise in the field of economics and chemical technology”. Obviously, it did not bother Erhard that Ter Mer and the other pharmaceutical drug lords had been tried in Nuremberg for war crimes. As part of the “give and take”, Erhard was rewarded with the appointment as vice-chancellor of Germany only one year later.
- Ludger Westrick was Chairman of the Board, President, and later Central Trustee of the state-owned “Vereinigte Industrie-Unternehmen AG” (VIAG) during the Nazi era. In post-war Germany, Westrick joined the Christian Democratic Party (CDU).
By 1964 – at the time of the above meeting – he had been appointed head of the German Chancellery, one of the most powerful positions in the German political system. In that function he controlled all the key decisions of German politics, including economics, foreign policy, secret service, political funds, public relations and propaganda of the post-WWII German government.
Westrick’s predecessor as head of the German chancellery – and the man who had coordinated the political and financial support for Hallstein and the construction of the “Brussels EU” from the German chancellery for the first 6 years of the new European politburo of the cartel in Brussels – was Hans Globke. Globke was a key figure in Hitler’s Ministry of Internal Affairs. He was the lawyer who was responsible for implementing Nazi laws and regulations, subjugating the occupied countries of Europe under the rule of the IG Farben/Nazi coalition. Moreover, Globke was co-author of the legal codex that made the Nuremberg racial laws binding law in Nazi Germany. This codex formed the legal basis for the annihilation of Jewish, Slavic and other people in Nazi occupied Europe. The second author of this codex, Wilhelm Stuckart, was a State secretary in the German Interior Ministry and was one of the selected few participants of the infamous “Wannsee Conference” that decided the extermination of more than 7 million Jewish people.
Westrick, the man in the picture, was the immediate successor of Globke and had been introduced into his office by this man.
- Karl Carstens was an enthusiastic Nazi follower, joining the SA in 1934. He was a registered member of the Nazi party, the NSDAP, from 1940 on. In 1955 he became a member of the German Christian Democratic Union.
In 1954 Carstens joined the German Foreign Service and from 1955 he was the official standing representative of the German Federal Republic at the European Council in Strasbourg! Concurrently, he advanced to the position of Vice-Minister of Foreign Affairs with the defined field of responsibility: “European Questions.”
In 1958 he advanced the Head of the Division “Europe West” within the German Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
- Karl-Günther von Hase joined the Wehrmacht, the German army, in 1936. He participated in the Nazi-German Invasion of Poland in 1939, the Battle of France in 1940 and the Invasion of Russia from 1941 to 1945, and married the daughter of a Nazi-General.
After the war, von Hase joined a diplomatic school in the Federal Republic of Germany and started a blitz-career in German politics. From 1962 to 1967 – including the time of the above meeting in Brussels – von Hase was head of the press office of the German government and responsible for its public relations and propaganda.
How did these bureaucrats, who were so involved with Nazi projects, come to have such prominent and influential positions post war?
Follow the money. The vast sums of stolen money hidden outside of Germany in the dying days of WWII.
The Frankfurt School quietly developed their philosophy in the universities of the USA and the UK. Their big chance came during the Vietnam War and the turmoil it caused in the university campuses of the US and UK. Such academics as Saul Alinsky had a very big influence on Obama and Clinton (appendix 8). Many University academics now support this philosophy and it is difficult to get a University teaching post unless you support it too.
It became known as the Age of Aquarius and of Liberated Personal Freedom, whereas, in reality the covert Frankfurt School of Marxism (appendix 3) was beginning to have an effect.
While it has no ‘Mr Big’ or Bible/Koran/Mein Kampf, it is a philosophy that many intellectuals and politicians find very attractive indeed. It gives them unelected authority and unaccountability, secure jobs, good salaries and pensions, and an exaggerated sense of their own importance. Good for their egos. They can then order the disenfranchised citizens about without sanction.