Net Zero is fools gold
CO2 AND THE NEW WORLD order
If you find this post of interest please forward it to all your contacts and MP. Anything you think is incorrect in this post please notify the editor listed at the bottom. No one has yet after several years
You do not need to be an Environmentalist or Climate scientist to follow this post. Net Zero is a precurser to ease in the New World Order.
Mankind is responsible for three mega threats to the survival of man. One of them is not Global Warming. They are toxic waste, pollution and overpopulation in the 3rd world who cannot feed and look after their children.
It should be noted that Net Zero has not been discussed by the public but it is being implemented by a small handful of zealots. The government should be given a Darwin Award for Net Zero?
Manmade CO2 is being accused of being the cause of catastrophic damage to the world’s future. Is it? However, we surely need more CO2 in the air? At the moment future environmental events are all purely speculation or built on models based on past events.
Why do so many ‘experts’ say we need less CO2? Folow the money – they will not get a grant unless they do.
Climate does not stand still but changes all the time – it always has done.
COP26 ties U.K. taxpayers to punishing #NetZero targets – £20k boilers, £50k to insulate your house, £50k electric cars, heat pumps that do not work when the air gets cold- while the world’s biggest polluters utterly ignore it????
You cannot tax People into Poverty to change the Weather.
Anthropogenic Global Warming is essentially a creature of The New World Order.
How does the BBC deal with the discussing of Climate Change?
However this post is supporting of the many ecological efforts to maintain and improve the diversity and the survival of the natural world, to reduce pollution and waste. It is aimed mainly at the premise that we need more CO2 not less.
We first of all need to know the scale of what is being suggested.
If you take a column of air 1 kilometer long
The line represents the column of air 1 kilometer long and the dot represents 400mm (15 inches) of CO2. It may be a GreenHouse gas but it is minuscule compared to water vapour and methane (marsh gas) and nitrous oxide. We cannot print a dot small enough to be truly representative of the CO2.
So why is CO2 now regarded as the cause of Global warming – that is if it really is the cause of warming? The last Ice Age ended about 12000 years ago and we have had a fairly benign and stable climate since. There have been many extreme events before the Ice Age of floods, wildfires, warm and cold periods far greater than in our very recent history AD.
Why are there so few scientific papers, if any, refuting Global Warming? No scientist would get any funding to carry out such a project and may even lose his job???
Very surprisingly GBNews claiming that Methane is second only to CO2 as a Greenhouse gas????
Net Zero is to stop the temperature of the world going up by 1degree. During the Holocene Optimum 6000 years ago the world temperature went up by over at least a degree to what it is today. The same in the time of the Roman empire and the Medieval Period when civilisations blossomed. There was no COP26 activity to make it do that and the world did not boil over. Humans lived through them quite happily.
If in 30 years’ time the earth’s temperature is only 1 degree hotter how will we know whether that is the result of man’s efforts or just the result of the earth’s natural temperature cycles?
Hydrocarbon is entirely made from hydrogen and carbon. The chief examples are oil, gas & coal. These substances lifted human society out of the dark ages & powered all modern civilisation. They continue to do so & India & China are building hundreds more coal fired power plants.
As can be seen the UK produces only 1% or the total and for this we want to bankrupt the UK for nothing more than virtue signaling.
Currently, over 1300 volcanoes in the world that all emit CO2. One Icelandic one has been erupting since March 2021 emitting 12000 tons of CO2 a day and still going. ( Dec 2021) It is a matter of dispute how much CO2 man is responsible for, possibly more than volcanoes but then we need much more CO2 in the atmosphere. That does not include those that erupt underwater that we nothing about.
There have been many scare stories in the last 70 years but none have ever come to pass
True or false? This has been on the internet for several years and Time magazine has not taken it down. The text 1977etc has clearly been over printed to emphasise the point.
COP26 Now 1 minute to midnight – yet again
Note – read the list – Prior to 1988, a coming Ice Age was the big fear and virtually no mention of Global Warming. After 1989 suddenly the Ice Age was no longer mentioned but Global warming appears. WHY?
Net Zero has all the attributes of being used to further a hidden agenda- What could it be? United Nations Environment Programme – linked to the New World Order?
It was of serious concern to the Environmentalists that none of their scares had happened so in 1991, the Club of Rome, a group of ‘elite’ individuals (seems to be a New World Order leaning Think Tank of self-appointed ‘experts’ linked to the Vatican and/or the UN?), published a book called ‘The First Global Revolution.’ In that book, they admitted they were looking for a cause in order to frighten the world’s population into accepting the New World Order as their savior. Take a look at the following statement from the 1991 book:
“In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions, these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together.” (The First Global Revolution – A Report by the Council of the Club of Rome, p.75). They settled on Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW)– warming due to man’s activities. (book available vailable at Amazon).
Soon after that Dr. Michael Mann came up with his ‘Hockey Stick’ graph, based on tree ring measurements, that he claimed demonstrated CO2 had been more less level but had dramatically risen since the start of the industrial revolution in about 1750. This conclusion has been thoroughly discredited in a high-profile court case. However it is still quoted by Warmists despite it denying the two warm periods and the two little ice ages. Greenland was ice free in 900 AD and covered in ice again by 1400AD long before the industrial revolution.
CO2 gas is an essential ingredient that is required for all vegetation to grow. Currently, at 400ppm but if it drops below 100ppm plants cease to grow.
350 million years ago in the Carboniferous Age, the CO2 level was about 20 – 30 times what it is now. The world did not boil over but there was an explosive growth of trees for 50 million years. These died, fell over, got covered, and in time became compressed into coal and lignite.
Coal is essential for steel making in the UK but the government will not allow the mining of coking coal in Cumbria so steel will have to be imported.
How much will it cost to remove this base foundation at the end of its working life? This cost is never programmed into the cost of wind energy unless they intend to leave them in place forever?
The concept of AGW due to man became completely untenable so the Environmentalists altered it to Climate Change due to the increase in CO2.
Climate Warriors say that the temperature will go up 1.5 degrees. If it does not how will we know whether it is due to the climate change precautions or just down to normal natural events as it did 2200 years ago and 1000 years ago?
Net Zero is surely today’s equivalent of witch doctors of old doing Rain Dances to control the weather.
What does an increase in CO2 do?
Well, let’s look at Wheat. To grow wheat five conditions are required.
◾A grain of wheat,
◾Fertile soil with trace elements
◾and Carbon Dioxide’
and trace elements
The DNA of the grain of wheat contains the instructions for the energy from sunshine to combine the rainwater and CO2 by photosynthesising them into carbohydrates as new ears of corn plus oxygen gas released into the atmosphere.
COP26 has voted to stop deforestation. The best way to achieve that is to increase CO2 in the air so more trees grow.
Across the countryside, you can see hundreds of poly growing- tunnels. The farmers enrich the air in the growing tunnels with higher levels of CO2 pumped into the tunnel to increase the yield of cucumbers or tomatoes etc by up to 35% and more.
COP26 has agreed that there must be a big reduction in CO2 gas and at the same time a major planting of trees. You cannot have both. Trees need CO2 gas to grow, without it they won’t grow.
This graph is perhaps the most significant AND DISTURBING item in this post as it shows how close we are now to the complete failure of plants to grow. We need more CO2 not less in the atmosphere.
CO2 is clearly not a problem so why the call for Net Zero? We need more CO2 not less as we are getting close to the extinction-level of plants?????
Where has the CO2 gone? Vast amounts go into the seashells of the billions of sea creatures and, when dead, they sink to the bottom of the sea to become chalk. See the White Cliffs of Dover to get an idea of its massive scale and how much CO2 must be locked up in the chalk and limestone.
Mankind is responsible for three mega threats to the survival of man. One of them is not Global Warming. They are toxic waste, pollution and overpopulation in the 3rd world who cannot feed and look after their children. Mankind can do absolutely nothing about the climate until we can control the sun.
How and why have they managed to instill fear of the climate into people?
As Goering said ‘if you find something to scare people you can get them to do anything’.
So why is there this ‘panic’ about CO2? It is self-evident that CO2 is not a problem and we need more of it. However, the scare over CO2 has all the attributes of a Hidden Agenda – what could it be?
Dr Ottmar Edenhofer is the co-chairman of the United Nations IPPC on climate.
It seems the UN wants to panic the people of the Western Industrial Society into having the wealth generated by their hard work to be distributed to the rest of the world who have not worked to achieve that wealth and to bring in the New World Order without clearly explaining to us what they intend. The dismantling of the Western Industrial Society. Reducing CO2 is part of their plan as it makes a very emotional message if not properly explained.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1453350471675039745 video of JFK’s speech 7 days before he was shot (may have been removed from the internet). He intended to make that speech public but someone had him shot. The finger of suspicion is pointing remorselessly at elements within the US Deep State.
“the pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world” – Professor Klaus Schwab – the new head man of the New World Order
Prince Charles using disturbingly similar words at COP26 warns of a ‘dangerously narrow window’ to act on climate change.
Are the Globalists using Covid and the Ecological Problems and exploiting them to further the New World Order and their aim to dismantle the Industrial Society? see http://www.theeuroprobe.org/the-wildlands-project-to-control-all-humans-and-agenda-21/
The use of fear to control the public is well known.
What is the New World Order? read http://www.theeuroprobe.org/2016-082-authoritarian-globalism-and-libertarian-populism/ – the New World Order. It wants the Western industrial and Capitalist society reduced to a shambles so they can rebuild a Socialist society from the ashes.
Why has the Media not reported this? read http://www.theeuroprobe.org/2017-059-operation-mockingbird/
Having read this post you have to decide whether we need more CO2 or Less. If as the government says it is less then are they using the so-called climate crisis to further a hidden agenda.
We are squandering the wealth the Western Industrial Society has built up to solve a problem that does not exist that will bankrupt the world.
None of the government’s new Green policies were in their manifesto. They and their Green Grollies are trying to implement Green policy without the agreement of the population.
The people of the UK should have a referendum on this Green agenda.
Mick Greenhough firstname.lastname@example.org