2014 – 034 Myths about the secret EU/US Trade Deal

A related precursor link to that open letter proposal I sent yesterday.



People, environment and democracy before profit and corporate rights

posted 21-May-2014 by Joe Mobbs

All the versions of this article: [Deutsch] [English] [français] [Português]

PNG - 1.3 Mb

People, environment and democracy before profit and corporate rights

Joint statement of European Civil Society groups working against the TTIP threat, May 2014

Download the PDF with logos

1. Who are we?

We are an EU-wide coalition of civil society organisations who share a deep concern about the various threats posed by the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership TTIP (also known as Transatlantic Free Trade Agreement or TAFTA). We represent a wide range of public interests including environmental protection, public health, agriculture, consumer rights and protection of food and farming standards, animal welfare, social and labour standards, workers’ rights, migrant rights, unemployment, youth and women’s issues, development, public access to information and digital rights, essential public services including education, integrity of financial systems, and others.

We are strongly committed to challenging the ongoing negotiations for the TTIP, in order to ensure transparent and democratic policy debate. Any agreements must serve the public interest and our common future.

2. What is TTIP?

TTIP is a far-reaching agreement currently being negotiated between the European Commission (on behalf of EU Member States) and the USA government. It is less about trade as tariffs are already generally very low between the EU and the USA, and mostly about regulations, standards, corporate rights and investment guarantees.

The proposed TTIP supposedly aims at facilitating direct investment, and eliminating unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles to market access for corporations from both sides of the Atlantic.

However, evidence from business and industry positions reveals that the focus on non-tariff barriers and regulatory convergence is being used to push deregulation, increased investment guarantees, intellectual property rights leading to monopolies, and a race to the bottom. The proclaimed but unsubstantiated economic benefits are marginal to society at large even in the best case scenarios. All evidence to date suggests that these goals threaten important rights acquired in long democratic struggles and societal interests of the public in the EU, US, and the rest of the world.

Negotiations are happening behind closed doors, without comprehensive and effective public consultation. National parliaments are not even informed about the details of the Commission’s negotiation texts – but the rare snippets of information that have been released — or leaked — raise considerable concerns.

3. What are our concerns?

- the lack of transparency and democratic procedures, which makes it impossible for citizens and civil society to monitor the negotiations in order to ensure that public interests are being protected. Currently these negotiations are extremely biased: business lobby groups are given privileged access to information and opportunities to influence the negotiations.
- the proposed investment protection chapter, particularly the inclusion of an Investor State Dispute Settlement provision. ISDS mechanisms give investors exclusive rights to sue states when democratic decisions – made by public institutions in the public interest – are considered to have negative impacts on their anticipated profits. These mechanisms rely on rulings outside the national courts and thereby undermine our national and EU legal systems, our democratic structures for formulating laws and policies in the public interest.
- the creation of new anti-democratic governance structures and procedures that aim to ’harmonise regulations’ like the proposed Regulatory Cooperation Council. These structures would make the TTIP a moving target, constantly developed in secret by unelected bureaucrats and big business. These undemocratic structures threaten to lower important standards and rules designed for the protection of public interests, or prohibit future improvements, regardless of necessity and public mandate. We are also concerned about the aim to strengthen protection and enforcement of “intellectual property rights” which could impede our rights to health, culture, education and free expression.

4. Our shared demands and goals:

Based on the values of international solidarity, social justice and environmental sustainability, and the respect of all human rights, we work together with our allies in the US and other parts of the world and we demand:

a) Transparency now: the EU Commission’s negotiation texts as well as all negotiation documents must be made public to allow for an open and critical public debate on the TTIP.

b) A democratic process, including scrutiny and assessment of the negotiation texts, which ensures that policies are in the public interest and which involves the EU Parliament, debate in national parliaments, civil society organisations, trade unions and stakeholder groups.

c) No ISDS: any provision containing Investor State Dispute Settlement mechanisms must be taken permanently out of the negotiations and no other mechanism introduced (including indirectly via other pre-existing or subsequent trade agreements) which grants privileged rights to investors.

d) No regulatory cooperation council: all regulation of business operations, trade conditions and setting of product- and production-standards must be in the hands of democratically controlled bodies and processes.

e) No deregulation of standards safeguarding and serving the public interest: the level of social and labour standards, consumer and public health protection, care for the environment including regeneration of our natural resources, animal welfare, food safety standards and environmentally sustainable agricultural practices, access to information and labelling, culture and medicine, financial market regulation as well as data protection and other digital rights need to be enhanced, not “harmonised” down to the lowest common denominator. Mutual recognition is not acceptable in as far as it undermines democratically agreed standards and safeguards. The precautionary principle must be widely applied.

f) No further deregulation and privatisation of public services. We demand guaranteed access to high quality education, health care and other public services and government procurement which promotes local jobs and local economies, local content, positive discrimination, social entrepreneurship, sustainable economics and serves the public interest.

g) The promotion of environmentally sustainable agricultural practices and protection of small family farming.

h) Public authorities must keep the political power and structures necessary to protect certain sensitive sectors and safeguard standards important to our quality of life. Internationally agreed labour and environmental standards must be respected and enforced. The continuous violation of labour standards should be addressed by imposing monetary fines.

Any EU-US trade agreements, now and in the future, should meet these demands, follow these principles and promote cooperation, social justice and ecological sustainability.


11.11.11, Belgium
Action For Breast Cancer Foundation, Malta 
Africa Contact, Denmark 
Africa Europe Faith and Justice Network (AEFJN) 
Aitec-IPAM, France
aktion / arbeitsunrecht, Germany 
Aktion Selbstbesteuerung e.V., Germany 
APRODEV – Association of World Council of Churches related Development Organisations in Europe 
aquattac, Europe-wide 
Arbeitsgemeinschaft bäuerliche Landwirtschaft – AbL, Germany 
ARC 2020 (Convention agricole et rurale 2020), Belgium 
ÄrztInnen für eine gesunde Umwelt (AeGU, ISDE), Austria 
ASEED Europe, Netherlands 
Association d’Amitié Franco Vietnamienne, Comité de Choisy le Roi – Val de Marne, France 
Attac Austria 
Attac Finland
Attac France 
Attac Germany 
Attac Iceland 
Attac Ireland 
Attac Sweden 
ATTAC Wallonie-Bruxelles, Belgium 
Austrian Federal Chamber of Labour 
Austrian Trade Union Federation
BI Fracking freies Hessen, Germany 
BI lebenswertes Korbach e.V., Germany 
Both ENDS, the Netherlands 
Campact e.V., Germany 
CEE Bankwatch Network 
Center for Encounter and Active Non-Violence, Austria 
La CGT, France 
Colibri, Germany 
Collectif citoyen les Engraineurs, France 
Collectif contre le grand marché transatlantique – Stop TAFTA, France 
Collectif des Associations Citoyennes, France 
Collectif Roosevelt, France 
Compassion in World Farming, Europe-wide 
Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO), Belgium 
Dachverband Entwicklungspolitik Baden-Württemberg (DEAB), Germany 
Eco Ruralis, Romania 
Ecologistas en Acción, Spain 
Educación para la Acción Crítica-EdPAC. Spain 
Ein Welt Forum Freiburg, Germany 
European Attac Network (EAN) 
European Coordination Via Campesina (ECVC) 
European Environmental Bureau 
European Federation of Journalists 
The European Public Health Alliance, Europe-wide 
European Water Movement 
Farms not Factories, UK 
Fairwatch, Italy 
Fondation Sciences Citoyennes, France 
Food & Water Europe 
Fracking Free Ireland 
Freedom Fight Info, Serbia 
Friends of the Earth Europe 
Friends of the Earth Spain 
GAIA – Grupo de Acção e Intervenção Ambiental, Portugal 
Générations Futures, France 
German League for Nature and Environment (Deutscher Naturschutzring – DNR) German NGO Forum on Environment and Development, Germany 
GLOBAL 2000 – Friends of the Earth Austria
Global Marshall Plan Initiative, Europe-wide 
GMO Information Center (“InfOMG”), Romania 
Golias Hebdo et Golias Magazine, France 
The Health and Environment Alliance (HEAL), Belgium 
Heaven or sHell, Sweden 
IBFAN Europe 
IBFAN Georgian Group
Ibfan Italia Initiativ Liewensufank, Luxembourg 
INKOTA-netzwerk, Germany 
Institute for sustainable development, Slovenia 
Irish Doctors Environmental Association, Ireland 
Keep Ireland Fracking Free, Ireland 
Kein Patent auf Leben! (“No Patents on Life!”), Germany 
LEF – FGE, Belgium 
Limerick Earth Day Network, Ireland 
Local Urban Development European Network (LUDEN), Belgium 
Mehr Demokratie, Germany 
MENSCHENRECHTE 3000 e.V. (Human Rights 3000), Germany 
MIM Moral in Motion, the Netherlands 
Naturefriends International NaturFreunde Deutschlands, Germany 
Nicos Poulantzas Institute, Greece 
NOAH – Friends of the Earth Denmark 
ÖBV-Via Campesina Austria 
Platform aarde Boer consument, The Netherlands 
Pokret za slobodu, Serbia 
Portmarnock Community Association, Beach committee, Ireland 
PowerShift, Germany 
PROVIEH – Verein gegen tierquälerische Massentierhaltung e.V., Germany 
Quercus – National Association for Nature Conservation, Portugal 
La Quadrature du Net, France 
Romania Fara Ei, Romania 
Schaliegasvrij Nederland, The Netherlands Service Civil International 
Slow Food Germany 
Slow Food International 
SOMO, the Netherlands 
SÜDWIND, Austria 
Transnational Institute
Transport & Environment, Belgium 
Umweltinstitut München e.V., Germany 
Unión Sindical Obrera (USO), Spain 
Védegylet Egyesület, Hungary
War on Want, UK 
WEED – World Economy, Ecology & Development, Germany 
Wemos, the Netherlands 
Women in Europe for a Common Future, France, Germany, The Netherlands 
Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom Holland 
World Development Movement, UK 
Workinggroup Food Justice, The Netherlands 
X minus Y Solidarity Fund, The Netherlands


– See more at: http://www.bilaterals.org/?people-environment-and-democracy#sthash.VJ4CdvPn.dpuf

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.