2021 – 039 Why the panic on CO2?

Net Zero  CO2 AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER

UPDATED

If you find this post of interest please forward it to all your contacts and MP. Anything you think is incorrect in this post please notify the editor listed at the bottom. No one has yet after several years

You do not need to be an Environmentalist or Climate scientist to follow this post.

Manmade CO2 is being accused of being the cause of catastrophic damage to the world’s future. Is it? However, we surely need more CO2 in the air? At the moment future environmental events are all purely speculation or built on models based on past events.

Image

COP26 ties U.K. taxpayers to punishing #NetZero targets – £20k boilers, £50k to insulate your house, £50k electric cars – while the world’s biggest polluters utterly ignore it????

Anthropogenic Global Warming is essentially a creature of  The New World Order.

How does the BBC deal with the discussing of Climate Change?

However this post is supporting of the many ecological efforts to maintain and improve the diversity and the survival of the natural world, to reduce pollution and waste. It is aimed mainly at the premise that we need more CO2.

We first of all need to know the scale of what is being suggested.

If you take a column of air 1 kilometer long

                                                                                                                              

The line represents the column of air 1 kilometer long and the dot represents 400mm (15 inches) of CO2. It may be a GreenHouse gas but it is minuscule compared to water vapour and methane (marsh gas) and nitrous oxide. We cannot print a dot small enough to be truly representative of the CO2.

So why is CO2 now regarded as the cause of Global warming – that is if it really is the cause of warming? The last Ice Age ended about 12000 years ago and we have had a fairly benign and stable climate since. There have been many extreme events since the Ice Age of floods, wildfires, warm and cold periods far greater than in our very recent history AD.

Why are there so few scientific papers, if any, refuting Global Warming? No scientist would get any funding to carry out such a project and may even lose his job???

Very surprisingly GBNews claiming that Methane is second only to CO2 as a Greenhouse gas????

During the Holocene Optimum 6000 years ago the world temperature went up by over at least a degree to what it is today. There was no COP26 activity to make it do that and humans lived through it quite happily.

If in 30 years’ time the earth’s temperature is only 1 degree hotter how will we know whether that is the result of man’s efforts or just the result of the earth’s natural temperature cycles?

What Is a Volcano? | NASA Space Place – NASA Science for Kids

Currently, over 1300 volcanoes in the world that all emit CO2. One Icelandic one has been erupting for 8 months emitting 12000 tons of CO2 a day and still going. It is a matter of dispute how much CO2 man is responsible for, possibly more than volcanoes but then we need much more CO2 in the atmosphere. That does not include those that erupt underwater that we nothing about.

There have been many scare stories in the last 70 years but none have ever come to pass

          COP26  Now 1 minute to midnight – yet again

Note – read the list – Prior to 1988, a coming Ice Age was the big fear and virtually no mention of Global Warming. After 1989 suddenly the Ice Age was no longer mentioned but Global warming appears. WHY?

It was of serious concern to the Environmentalists that none of their scares had happened so in 1991, the Club of Rome, a group of ‘elite’ individuals (seems to be a  New World Order leaning Think Tank of self-appointed ‘experts’ linked to the Vatican and/or the UN?), published a book called ‘The First Global Revolution.’ In that book, they admitted they were looking for a cause in order to frighten the world’s population into accepting the New World Order as their savior. Take a look at the following statement from the 1991 book:

“In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions, these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together.” (The First Global Revolution – A Report by the Council of the Club of Rome, p.75). They settled on Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW)– warming due to man’s activities.  (book available vailable at Amazon).

Dr Patrick Moore was one of the founders of Greenpeace. He left when his colleagues (none of whom were scientists) joined up with the Club of Rome & others to support the present official theory that increased carbon dioxide from human activity was causing catastrophic global warming.

Soon after that Dr. Michael Mann came up with his ‘Hockey Stick’ graph, based on tree ring measurements, that he claimed demonstrated CO2 had been more less level but had dramatically risen since the start of the industrial revolution in about 1750. This conclusion has been thoroughly discredited in a high-profile court case.  However it is still quoted by Warmists despite it denying the two warm periods and the two little ice ages. Greenland was ice free in 900 AD and covered in ice again by 1400AD long before the industrial revolution.

CO2 gas is an essential ingredient that is required for all vegetation to grow. Currently, at 400ppm but if it drops below 100ppm plants cease to grow.

350 million years ago in the Carboniferous Age, the CO2 level was about 20 – 30 times what it is now. The world did not boil over but there was an explosive growth of trees for 50 million years. These died, fell over, got covered, and in time became compressed into coal and lignite.

Image

The concept of AGW due to man became completely untenable so the Environmentalists altered it to Climate Change due to the increase in CO2.

Climate Warriors say that the temperature will go up 1.5 degrees. If it does not how will we know whether it is due to the climate change precautions or just down to normal natural events as it did between 2500 years ago and 1500 years ago?

What does an increase in CO2 do?

Well, let’s look at Wheat. To grow wheat five conditions are required.

◾A grain of wheat,

◾Fertile soil with trace elements

◾Rainwater,

◾Sunshine,

◾and Carbon Dioxide’

and trace elements

The DNA of the grain of wheat contains the instructions for the energy from sunshine to combine the rainwater and CO2 by photosynthesising them into carbohydrate as new ears of corn plus oxygen gas released into the atmosphere.

COP26 has voted to stop deforestation. The best way to achieve that is to increase CO2 in the air so more trees grow.

Greenhouse tunnel from polythene plastic on an agricultural field, panorama format. Greenhouse tunnel from polythene plastic on an agricultural field, long stock photos

Across the countryside, you can see hundreds of poly growing- tunnels. The farmers enrich the air in the growing tunnels with higher levels of CO2 pumped into the tunnel to increase the yield of cucumbers or tomatoes etc by up to 35% and more.

COP26 has agreed that there must be a big reduction in CO2 gas and at the same time a major planting of trees. You cannot have both. Trees need CO2 gas to grow, without it they won’t grow.

Image

This graph is perhaps the most significant AND DISTURBING item in this post as it shows how close we are now to the complete failure of plants to grow. We need more CO2 not less in the atmosphere.

CO2 is clearly not a problem so why the call for Net Zero? We need more CO2 not less as we are getting close to the extinction level of plants?????

Where has the CO2 gone? Vast amounts go into the seashells of the billions of sea creatures and, when dead, they sink to the bottom of the sea to become chalk. See the White Cliffs of Dover to get an idea of its massive scale and how much CO2 must be locked up in the chalk and limestone.

Mankind is responsible for three mega threats to the survival of man. One of them is not Global Warming. They are toxic waste, pollution and overpopulation in the 3rd world who cannot feed and look after their children. Mankind can do absolutely nothing about the climate until we can control the sun.

So why is there this ‘panic’ about CO2? It is self-evident that CO2 is not a problem and we need more of it. However, the scare over CO2 has all the attributes of a Hidden Agenda – what could it be?

Dr Ottmar Edenhofer is the co-chairman of the United Nations IPPC on climate.

 

It seems the UN wants to panic the people of the Western Industrial Society into having the wealth generated by their hard work to be distributed to the rest of the world who have not worked to achieve that wealth and to bring in the New World Order without clearly explaining to us what they intend.  The dismantling of the Western Industrial Society. Reducing CO2 is part of their plan as it makes a very emotional message if not properly explained.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1453350471675039745  video of JFK’s speech 7 days before he was shot  (may have been removed from the internet). He intended to make that speech public but the US Deep State beat him to it and had him shot.

“the pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world” – Professor Klaus Schwab – the new head man of the New World Order

Prince Charles using disturbingly similar words at COP26 warns of a ‘dangerously narrow window’ to act on climate change.

Are the Globalists using Covid and the Ecological Problems and exploiting them to further the New World Order and their aim to dismantle the Industrial Society?  see  http://www.theeuroprobe.org/the-wildlands-project-to-control-all-humans-and-agenda-21/

Itshould also be noted that

Greta Thunberg’s handler, Luisa-Marie Neubauer, is a Rothschild

What is the New World Order?    read  http://www.theeuroprobe.org/2016-082-authoritarian-globalism-and-libertarian-populism/  – the New World Order. It wants the Western industrial society reduced to a shambles so they can rebuild a Socialist society from the ashes.

Why has the Media not reported this?    read   http://www.theeuroprobe.org/2017-059-operation-mockingbird/

Having read this post you have to decide whether we need more CO2 or Less. If as the government says it is less then are they using the so-called climate crisis to further a hidden agenda.

We are squandering the wealth the Industrial Society has built up to solve a problem that does not exist that will bankrupt the world.

None of the government’s new Green policies were in their manifesto. They and their Green Grollies are trying to implement Green policy without the agreement of the population.

The people of the UK should have a referendum on this Green agenda.

Mick Greenhough  editor@theeuroprobe.org

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.