2013 – 013 Deep State really rules the UK -How the Cabinet Office got Lisbon Treaty through parliament without MPs seeing it.

The Lisbon Treaty originally the EU Constitution but was rejected by the French and Dutch citizens. It was then was written in bureaucratic gobbldegook with critical passages moved to other Treaties to hide them and make it impossible for ordinary people to understand and called the Lisbon Treaty. However it has been deciphered There is a small handful of people who love to decode such bureaucratic verbiage into simple everyday wording,

 

Our Civil Service is really now The Deep State. They  are unelected and mainly self selected from their own section of society. They are permanent staff who advise ministers and continue  in the same post as ministers change. Ministers rarely have much expertise in the job they have been allotted and it takes perhaps 3 years to acquire that knowledge. They are then moved on to another post to be replaced by another inexperienced Minister. The proud boast of the Civil Service was that it was neutral and gave sound advice to ministers irrespective of the politics of the minister. They have now become politicised and consider the ministers to be fools to be manipulated to the collective political views of the Deep State. Their remit is the Globalised New World Order. They are now working behind the backs of elected ministers to implement policies that have not been through parliament. Their behaviour is Malfeasance and should be punishable with dismissal and loss of pension rights.

The way the Lisbon Treaty was passed by parliament is a good example of their manipulations to achieve completely undemocratic parliamentary  results to suit their political desires. They have complete contempt for the democratic opinions of the voting public.

The Lisbon Treaty was originally the EU Constitution. This was comprehensively rejected by the French and Dutch. To get around this Giscard d’Estaing , the ex French premier, had the constitution deliberately re written in bureaucratic gobbledegook  so that it was almost impossible for any one but a constitutional expert to understand. The label on the tin was different but the contents the same. Several critical passages were removed and hidden in other Treaties other passages in restraint and you need a special pass to see them. Somr passages even Merkel and Juncker are not allowed to read. Leads one to suspect there are faceless people who are over Merkel and Juncker. Who are they?

There is a small handful of people who love to decode such bureaucratic verbiage into simple everyday wording,

To see the Lisbon Treaty  decoded go to http://www.theeuroprobe.org/2019-012-if-uk-stays-in-the-eu-these-are-the-consequences/  

It will horrify you.

They also made the text font smaller to make the document smaller and seem less.

“The reality is that the Lisbon Treaty,which is actually called The Consolidated Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TUE), has not been read by many.
A huge portion of it is in  annexes which are “restrainte”, they are not in the public domain, only those granted access by the European Commission can legally read the treaty in its entirety. This means that the pro EU BBC, politicians and journalists are promoting the Lisbon Treaty when have not been able to read it and do not know what it commits us to.
It is also enormous,one  EU official called it the largest document in human history, they may well be correct. Furthermore the annexes are amended in secret to reflect ECJ case rulings.
We are being governed by the provisions of a treaty we are not allowed to read in full and that is regularly  amended without our knowledge or consent. This applies not only to us common folk ,but also to our MPs. In fact huge rafts of EU policy, based on the treaty, are unavailable even to the likes of Merkel and Macron.”
I understand the document is 3000 pages long.
Was it ever written to be understood?if so by whom?.
If our own politicians cannot read it or understand it
how the hell can they sign up for it?.

Gordon Brown said after he had ratified it ‘I have ensured a number of Red Lines to secure Britain’s future’. Sounds good but he omitted to add that the Red Lines would be there for no more than 5 years. Was this lying? He was deceitful to such an extent that it was no different to lying.

So how was the Lisbon Treaty ratified by our parliament?

The Brussels Manikin or ‘What Brussels and the British political elite think of the British people’

brusselsmalikin

The Lisbon Treaty was signed by Gordon Brown in October 2007 without first having the Referendum as promised in the Labour Party Manifesto.*

The un-amended Treaty of Lisbon was deposited in the Commons on Dec 17th 2007. Most of the MPs had gone home for Christmas by then as parliament recessed the next day. How many knew it was there let alone read it? For the disastrous consequences for British democracy and sovereignty see 2014 – 028 The facts about the Lisbon Treaty

Parliament returned on Jan 7th 2008. One of their first votes was to ratify the Lisbon Treaty previously signed by Gordon Brown.
Although the government had the amended Treaty (by now 3000 + pages) for some time it was not deposited in the Commons Reading Room until 11.45am on the morning that MPs had to vote to ratify it (21 Jan 2008).  Again how many knew the amended Treaty was there and would it have mattered. It was quite impossible for an MP to read 3000+ pages – with numerous sections having then been transferred to, and scattered among, numerous other Treaties and documents – and get an understanding of what it was all about before the vote.

Our elected MPs signed away British sovereignty and democracy with only a very small handful of them understanding just how sinister the Lisbon Treaty is. They were dismissed as hysterical scaremongers but have been proved right. The few who attended the session clearly did not pay attention. The majority did not have even the foggiest clue of what on earth they were voting for. They just did as the whips told them. This was an appalling betrayal of their duty as MPs, the British Constitution and the people of this country. They were the same MPs who fleeced the country with their expenses scandal.** It would seem that many MPs have been involved in paedophilia either directly or complicit in covering it up.

What is very worrying is that this ploy was probably not concocted by the MPs. It must have been done by some very senior un-elected and faceless bureaucrats.

The finger of suspicion points directly to the Cabinet Office.

This deliberate deceit must surely call into question the validity of the vote and the legal status of the UK’s passing of the Lisbon Treaty.

© Mick Greenhough 2011

I had several meetings with Nigel Spearing at the House of Commons. For  26 years he was Labour MP for Newham, 18 years member of House of Commons Select Committee on the EU and 8 years chairman of that committee. Although no longer an MP his seniority allowed him an open pass in the House of Commons even into the records room enabling him to ferret out this information.

*   Why did Gordon Brown ignore his manifesto promise to have a Referendum on the UK membership of the EU? Was it just another of their many empty promises?***

** There were some MPs who did not fiddle their expenses but who knew what was going on and kept silent. As such they are also complicit.

*** Tony Blair and Gordon Brown reneged on this promise but so has David Cameron reneged on his ‘Cast Iron’ promise. Their feeble excuse was that the EU Constitution has been renamed the ‘Lisbon Treaty and although the contents of the tin was the exactly same it was, somehow, totally different.

However, a court case challenged the decision by Gordon Brown not to have the Labour Party manifesto promise of a referendum, along with the formal statement by Tony Blair that the Labour Party manifesto was a Contract with the People.

But Gordon Brown’s barrister Ms. Cecelia Ivimy said on behalf of her client:“They (NuLabour manifesto promises and contracts) are not subject to legitimate expectation”. 2013 – 020 The value of party manifestos

Astonishing?

Even more astonishing is that the Brighton County Court judge accepted this defence. His judgement was: ‘The public should not expect promises or contracts made in NuLabour Party manifestos to be kept’. A case of lies, damn lies and NuLabour manifesto promises perhaps? From now on any promise in a NuLabour manifesto will be pointless as they can quite legally ignore all promises and contracts made in that manifesto if they regain power. (ref. 2008-15). Presumably that also applies to the Cameron Tories.

The ‘Treaty’ is the Constitution – with a different name. As previously noted: ‘the label on the tin may be different, but the contents are identical’ (see chapter 15 for Mandelson’s statement on referenda and ref. 2006-54).

And it should be remembered that the most insidious part of the Lisbon Treaty is that it’s ‘self-amending (see chapt. 13 & 17). That allows the unelected European Commission to alter anything in it they wish without involving any of the elected politicians. Several of the clauses are ‘in restraint’ – that is only approved bureaucrats can read them. Certainly not UK MEPs.

One very disturbing aspect of this is that the great majority of the MPs must have  known nothing of this. It must have been thought up and carried out by a very small number of the political elite and with some complicit very senior Civil Servants. The finger of suspicion points at The Cabinet Office.

It was not the first time. The MPs were allowed to see the 1972 ECAct but not allowed to read it until after they had voted for it.

©  Mick Greenhough

13 responses to “2013 – 013 Deep State really rules the UK -How the Cabinet Office got Lisbon Treaty through parliament without MPs seeing it.

  1. Pingback: 2012 – 022 Degrading the morale and capabilities of UK Armed Forces | The Euro Probe

  2. The 1689 Bill of rights act strictly and specifically forbids the handing over of sovereignty to a foreign power. All the Eu treaties thus far have been signed illegally and the signatories are therefore guilty of treason!

    • Mick Greenhough

      Except Blair repealed the Treason act buried deep in the Crime and Punishment Act

      Heath lied to parliament to get the ’72 Act through and the MPs were not allowed to read it until after they had voted.

  3. I’ve been slated for telling the truth about the Lisbon treaty. It complex but ment to be so, I’d like to know more if I can. I’ve read sections over and over again to try and make sense of it. No politician talks about it, even the brexiteers politicians! Is it because they no very little off the treaty.

    • The Lisbon Treaty was originally the EU Constitution rejected by the people of France and Holland. Giscard d’Estaing had it rewritten in bureaucratic double talk and section scattered among other treaties. A deliberate effort to make it unreadable to any but a professional bureaucrat.

  4. I would really like to post this information on social media but it is important to me that I can justify the assertions by quoting specific paragraphs of LT. I have tried to read through published versions of the LT (nightmare) and maybe because I am not a lawyer I am struggling to connect the 25 points to the specific parts of the LT. Can you please help me with this.

    • Mick Greenhough

      The Lisbon Treaty was deliberately written so as to be unreadable to all but highly skilled bureaucrats, Several passages are only available to those with special permission and it seems several passages even Merkel and Juckter are not allowed to read.

  5. None of those points are in the Treaty of Lisbon.

    This is the treaty:

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/228848/7310.pdf

    You’ve fallen for an old Facebook hoax.

    I strongly advise reading the actual treaty itself before disseminating further lies.

    If you would like to challenge me in this, please do. I’d be more than happy to go through the points from the hoax you have pasted alongside the real treaty in intense detail – via livestream should you so wish.

    • Mick Greenhough

      I was a personal friend of Nigel Spearing, 8 years chairman of the HoC select Committee on Europe and 26 years Labour MP for Newham. I met him many times in the HoC where he gave me that information plus much more. He,if anyone, should know what the Lisbon Treaty was about. I take it you have read all 3000 pages of the Lisbon Treaty If so you are a truly remarkable person. de’Estange had it deliberately written in Bureacratic double talk to make impossible for only a few dedicated bureaucrats to be able to read it let alone understand it. He also had several passages transferred to other Treaties to make them very difficult to find. I take it also you have had the necessary special permission to read the huge portion of it is in annexes which are “restrainte”, they are not in the public domain, only those granted access by the European Commission can legally read the treaty in its entirety. I would be interested to know how you obtained that permission to read that passages in restrainte?
      This means that the pro EU BBC, politicians and journalists are promoting the Lisbon Treaty when have not been able to read it and do not know what it commits us to.
      It is also enormous one. EU official called it the largest document in human history, they may well be correct. Furthermore the annexes are amended in secret to reflect ECJ case rulings. We are being governed by the provisions of a treaty we are not allowed to read in full and that is regularly amended without our knowledge or consent. This applies not only to us common folk ,but also to our MPs. In fact huge rafts of EU policy, based on the treaty, are unavailable even to the likes of Merkel and Macron.”
      We are being governed by the provisions of a treaty we are not allowed to read in full and that is regularly amended without our knowledge or consent. (It is a clone of Hitler’s 1933 Enabling Act) This applies not only to us common folk ,but also to our MPs. In fact huge rafts of EU policy, based on the treaty, are unavailable even to the likes of Merkel and Macron.”

  6. Mick,
    yes, I have read the entire treaty and all amendments thereof literally thousands of times in intense detail over the past ten years. It’s part of my job.

    Lets start with some specifics – can you please paste the exact paragraphs, articles and clauses that pertain directly to the 26 points you have written?

    You have a direct link to the real treaty (not the old Facebook hoax that you have quoted, but the real thing), so please go through it and highlight the 26 points you claim are in the treaty.

    I’d recommend we proceed as follows – We will take ‘your’ claims plus the real Treaty of Lisbon, then via livestream we can go through your claims point by point (all 26 of them) using a simply search function. We simply put the keywords in the search box and analyse the results.

    For reference, I also have hard copy versions of all EU treaties, directives and agreements.
    Would you be up for that? If so, please let me know a time and date that would be suitable.

    I think it’s imperative that people know the truth. Don’t you agree?

  7. There are no passages “in restraint”.

    Going back to the claims in the hoax – how many have you managed to find in the treaty itself? (Linked above).

    Can you please put up the exact passages, articles and wording from the treaty itself to substantiate the claims you have pasted into your feature? I’d like an honest answer.

    I’ve also asked the conspiracy theorist who adapted this hoax and spread it all over Facebook to do the same, I even offered him the option of either participating in a livestream or coming to the studio to go over the hoax and the real treaty. This hoax first appeared in 2009, and has been added to gradually by various people.
    This hoax was one of the main reasons people voted Leave in the referendum.
    Of course, I understand that it’s hard to admit you’ve been manipulated, but many have already done so and come to terms with it. We are all merely human.

    Let’s start with the dates – where can we find 2020 in the treaty?
    And maybe the Euro – where does the treaty negate the opt-out secured by the UK in the Maastricht Treaty of 1992? The Treaty of Lisbon (its correct name) amends other treaties. The link I have pasted is the consolidated version – this means all the amendments are put in context. The Treaty has been online since 2009 for all to see., and it takes less than 10 seconds to run a wordsearch to dispel the hoax you have copied. Even someone who is not at all familiar with contracts, treaties and agreements can do it in a matter of seconds.

    We can go through each of the points from the hoax step by step, in detail (in a friendly tone BTW) if you so wish. I’ve done it literally thousands of times, the result is always identical, with no exceptions.

    • Mick Greenhough

      I had several meeting with Nigel Spearing, Labour MP for Newham for 26 years, who was the chairman of the House of Commons Select Committee on Europe for 8 years. Although no longer an MP he had an open pass to go anywhere in the Palace of Westminster – including where all the records were kept. The information he gave me was
      • The Lisbon Treaty was a virtual clone of the 1933 Nazi Enabling Act.
      • The Lisbon Treaty was a repackaging of the EU Constitution rejected by France and Holland
      • D’Estange had it rewritten in Bureaucratic double talk to make impossible to be read by any but those who wrote it.
      • It is some 3000 pages long.
      • It was placed in the HoC reading room 11.45 on the day MPs had to vote on it. It was voted through parliament without any MP knowing what was in it.
      • As an Enabling Act specially selected unelected and faceless bureaucrats can add, remove or change any of the clauses without referring to any elected person
      • Many clauses were transferred to other Treaties to hide them.
      • Several clauses were in ‘restraint’. Only authorised people are allowed to read them. Since been informed that some clauses even Merkel and Juncker are not allowed to see.
      • He also informed me that in the 1972 EC ACT three words were slipped in. All EU law will become UK law ‘without further enactment’. That is all EU law would bypass our parliament to become UK law without MPs being able to debate and reject it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.