From ‘Brave New Europe?’ Chap 18

Will we have a Referendum?

Is it just another of their many empty promises? Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and Cameron have all reneged on this promise. Even David Cameron’s  ‘Cast Iron’ promise on the feeble excuse that it is now called the ‘Lisbon Treaty’ instead.
A recent court case challenged the decision by Gordon Brown not to have the Labour Party manifesto promise of a referendum, along with the formal statement by Tony Blair that the Labour Party manifesto was a Contract with the People. But Gordon Brown’s barrister Ms. Cecelia Ivimy said on behalf of her client: “They (NuLabour manifesto promises and contracts) are not subject to legitimate expectation”. Astonishing?
Even more astonishing is that the Brighton County Court judge accepted this defence. His judgement was: ‘The public should not expect promises or contracts made in NuLabour Party manifestos to be kept’. A case of lies, damn lies and NuLabour manifesto promises perhaps? From now on any promise in a NuLabour manifesto will be pointless as they can quite legally ignore all promises and contracts made in that manifesto if they regain power.. Presumably that also applies to the Cameron Tories.
The ‘Treaty’ is the Constitution – with a different name. As previously noted: ‘the label on the tin may be different, but the contents are identical’ (see chapter 15 for Mandelson’s statement on referenda and ref. 2006-54). And it should be remembered that the most insidious part of the Lisbon Treaty is that it’s ‘self-amending and does not need to be referred back to elected politicians.

© Mick Greenhough 2009

http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/10244880.North_Yorkshire_company_says_ EU_ban_on_local_product_led_to_horse_meat_crisis/?ref=rss

North Yorkshire company says EU ban on local product led to horse meat crisis –  21st February 2013

A NORTH Yorkshire company which produced desinewed meat before EU regulations banned it last year, has told an MP the new regulations led directly to the appearance of horse meat in UK food.  The owners of Newby Foods, based at Newby Wiske near Northallerton, North Yorkshire, used to supply beef and lamb to all the major supermarkets and food processing companies.  But in March last year the European Commission ruled that desinewed meat – meat removed from the bone – must be reclassified as mechanically separated meat.

The EC banned it with seven days notice, despite the UK Government making it clear there were no health risks associated with the product.  The move left many food manufacturers with a very tight deadline to source an equally cheap source of meat for their products  Newby Foods boss, Doug Manning, said the vast majority of companies his firm supplied prior to the ban have now been found to have been selling products containing horse meat.

Mr Manning, the company’s operations director, said: “We produced pork, chicken, lamb and beef. We’re still producing pork and chicken, but just 50 per cent of the business we had.  “I would say 90 per cent of the companies that had a problem with horse meat, we used to supply.”  He said the ban was devastating for the company, which had to lay off more than a third of its staff – 40 people – a month later and now has £2m worth of meat extraction machinery lying idle in his factory.

Continue reading →

The myth that 60% of our trade goes to the EU is based on the Rotterdam Effect.

There are SIX huge trans-shipment ports in the EU where goods destined for non-EU markets are logged as exports to the EU before being loaded onto larger vessels that set off on their journeys to the Rest of the World.

ROTTERDAM

HAMBURG

ANTWERP

SINES GIOIA

Continue reading →

LATEST FROM FREENATIONS
www.freenations.freeuk.com/news-2013-02-27.html

BRITISH FARMING AND THE ORIGINAL MODEL FOR THE COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY
by Edward Spalton

Since 1 January 1973 Britain has not had an agricultural policy of its own. British farming and food production have been entirely controlled by the European Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) with the institutions of the UK as its agent. This is a very short note to sketch in outline what our own policy used to be like, what we got into in 1973, where that policy originated and what it is like today.

The 1947 Agriculture Act

Britain had come close to starving twice through submarine blockade in both wars and was also very short of foreign exchange. It was therefore decided to have a policy which would encourage the production of a considerable proportion of our own food whilst allowing all the world to send its food here without customs duty. Farmers received subsidy from the taxpayer to ensure a price at which an efficient farm could be profitable. This was negotiated each year in a price review between the farming organisations and the Ministry of Agriculture, subject to parliamentary approval. So, if the world price of (say) wheat was £25 per ton and and efficient British farmer needed £30 per ton to be profitable, a “deficiency payment” of £5 per ton would be paid. Without this British farms could not compete with overseas areas enjoying more favourable climatic and other conditions. Thus the taxpayer paid once for a degree of food security but the market was otherwise allowed to operate freely. There was bureaucracy but very little by present day standards. Low food prices assisted the less well off and reduced pressure on wages. It was a simple, logical system for a largely urban population . Commonwealth and other countries could ship their produce here freely and our industrial exports flowed in the opposite direction.

The Approach to the changeover

  Continue reading →

I had several meetings with Nigel Spearing at the House of Commons. For  26 years he was Labour MP for Newham, 18 years member of House of Commons Select Committee on the EU and 8 years chairman of that committee. Although no longer an MP his seniority allowed him an open pass in the House of Commons even into the records room enabling him to ferret out this information.

Our Civil Service is really now The Deep State. They are unelected and mainly self-selected from their own section of society. They are permanent staff who advise ministers and continue in the same post as ministers change. Ministers rarely have much expertise in the job they have been allotted and it takes perhaps 3 years to acquire that knowledge. They are then moved on to another post to be replaced by another inexperienced Minister. The proud boast of the Civil Service was that it was neutral and gave sound advice to ministers irrespective of the politics of the minister. They have now become politicised and consider the ministers to be fools to be manipulated to the collective political views of the Deep State. Their remit is the Globalised New World Order. They are now working behind the backs of elected ministers to implement policies that have not been through parliament. Their behaviour is Malfeasance and should be punishable with dismissal and loss of pension rights.

The way the Lisbon Treaty was passed by parliament is a good example of their manipulations to achieve completely undemocratic parliamentary results to suit their political desires. They have complete contempt for the democratic opinions of the voting public.

The Lisbon Treaty was originally the EU Constitution. This was comprehensively rejected by the French and Dutch. To get around this Giscard d’Estaing , the ex French premier, had the constitution deliberately rewritten in bureaucratic gobbledegook so that it was almost impossible for anyone but a constitutional expert to understand. The label on the tin was different but the contents the same. Several critical passages were removed and hidden in other Treaties. Other passages are in restraint and you need a special pass to see them. Some passages even Merkel and Juncker are not allowed to read. Leads one to suspect there are faceless people who are over Merkel and Juncker. Who are they?

Continue reading →

What Will Happen to the England  Rugby, Cricket and Football Teams?

Does anybody know?  European National football teams, (indeed all National sports teams), are quite incompatible with the principles of the EU. The EU Toine Mander’s plan to eliminate all national teams

.
•    Will the Commission allow an ‘England’ sports team to exist when they have gone to such lengths to remove England from the map of Europe?
•    Would they allow an ‘England’ team to be selected from nine regions, but a ‘Scotland’ team from only one?
•    Who will be allowed to play for an ‘England’ that doesn’t exist?
•    This may take years to come about but it is their intention to do so whatever they say.
It may be that parts of eastern England will be lumped together with bits of Western Europe to form a new soccer team – called ‘Trans-Manche’ perhaps?
The Commission has already signaled its desire, with the Mander’s Plan, to close down all national teams and take full control of European football (Scottish Sun, Jan. 24, 2007).They particularly want this control for its potential as a platform for propaganda, along with the vast sums of money generated, particularly the TV rights (ref. 2006-47).
The Commission is intent, sooner or later, to have the pompous EU Anthem being sung at every European championship match even though it was removed from the LisbonTreaty.

Football clubs linked to a town/city, such as Liverpool and Manchester, will be OK but not national teams.

The Mander’s Plan is out of the public domain as of now but it is on the back burner to be brought back at some time in the future.

© Mick Greenhough 2009

Continue reading →

Issue 3 ‘ Brave New Europe? – now available

Amazon  https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1911090488/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1487240777&sr=8-1&keywords=mick+greenhough

Email order form to   http://www.shieldcrest.co.uk/mick-greenhough.html

Local Bookshop  ISBN 978-1-911090-48-9

© Mick Greenhough 2008

What do the experts think of it? Many supportive letters and comments were received after issue 1 was published – among them:

Continue reading →

What About the UK Referendum promised by Tony Blair, the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives? They are a pack of deceptful knaves.
Is it just another of their many empty promises? Tony Blair and Gordon Brown reneged on this promise but so has David Cameron reneged on his ‘Cast Iron’ promise on the feeble excuse that it is now called the ‘Lisbon Treaty’ instead.
A recent court case challenged the decision by Gordon Brown not to have the Labour Party manifesto promise of a referendum, along with the formal statement by Tony Blair that the Labour Party manifesto was a Contract with the People. But Gordon Brown’s barrister Ms. Cecelia Ivimy said on behalf of her client: “They (NuLabour manifesto promises and contracts) are not subject to legitimate expectation”. Astonishing?
Even more astonishing is that the Brighton County Court judge accepted this defence. His judgement was: ‘The public should not expect promises or contracts made in NuLabour Party manifestos to be kept’. A case of lies, damn lies and NuLabour manifesto promises perhaps? From now on any promise in a NuLabour manifesto will be pointless as they can quite legally ignore all promises and contracts made in that manifesto if they regain power. (ref. 2008-15). Presumably that also applies to the Cameron Tories.
The ‘Treaty’ is the Constitution – with a different name. As previously noted: ‘the label on the tin may be different, but the contents are identical’ (see chapter 15 for Mandelson’s statement on referenda and ref. 2006-54). And it should be remembered that the most insidious part of the Lisbon Treaty is that it’s ‘self-amending

© Mick Greenhough 2008

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Brussels questions future of EU referendums Published: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 11:09:51 GMT+02
Author: Bruno Waterfield

A new EU constitution should not be put to the people, European Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson has insisted.
Germany will start the process to revive or redraft an EU constitutional treaty following last year’s referendum rejections in France and the Netherlands.

Continue reading →

Tuesday, 29 January 2013, 0:25
Subject: comment in Express – in Nov 2014 Lisbon will mean we need EU permission for a Referendum?

This is why he is kicking the Referendum down the road.

Please forward this hyperlink on to all your contacts and MP  editor@theeuroprobe.org

Our police are now continually accused of Two Tier policing. Television images regularly show the police kneeling, dancing the Macarena, getting cups of tea or standing idly by for left wing activists and foreign protesters while turning out in riot gear when normal exasperated British citizens demonstrate and they are labeled Far Right wing and Nazi thugs (despite the Nazis being Far Left – National Socialist) when their reasonable concerns are completely ignored by our political Illuminati and vilified by the Woke Media. The police are now exploiting Non Crime Hate Speech to close down Free Speech and make up criminal offenses.

The Police Chiefs must now admit that they are more concerned with the human rights of criminals and those who hate the UK than they are of our children and the law abiding public.

The Two Tier policing is surely a major cause of the loss of trust in the police. The senior police make pompous and pious statements after each event that never refer to the root cause of the problem and hardly anyone believes what they say anymore. Another major cause is the political and Media Illuminati are trying to enforce integration onto the Lumpen Proletariat who do not want to integrate as they are quite happy as they are. Could it be the influence of Common Purpose in their upper ranks who view Left Wing transgressions more kindly than what they perceive to be  Right Wing transgressions.

The Lumpen Proletariat are aware that their culture is being changed without our political Illuminati consulting them to see if they want their culture changed. Illegal behaviour by Far Left wing activists is openly tolerated but bad behaviour by so called Far Right (the Lumpen Proletariat) is vociferously condemned  WHY???

https://www.theeuroprobe.org/2024-007-the-britons-and-caucasians-who-are-they/ Continue reading →

—-I think that the Eurgendfor is a very worrying development and I should like this article to reach as many people as possible.   If you feel able to send it onwards, or use it any way (I’d be grateful for a credit for the magazine and myself) please do so.

Sonya Porter

In a message dated 27/01/2013 13:10:03 GMT Standard Time, Sonyaporter@aol.com writes:

EUROGENDFOR policing sans frontieres?

Having worked in Paris I can agree with this  editor@theeuroprobe.org but also agree they have many very unpleasant migrants to deal with.

Continue reading →

Many of the Charities are now very good cash cows for the management and executive officers. Charities should be required to publish on the internet their accounts giving all costs, salaries and expenses to maintain their charitable status.

It would seem that the RSPCA has been hi-jacked by a group of extremely militant left wing vegitarians. They have said that they are not really interested in getting cats out of trees now but consider themselves to be a ‘Lobby Organisation’. They have spent several £million on an expensive new HQ and recruited several ‘Managers’ on grossly excessive salaries . They should now be rubbing shoulders with the the political elite. How many RSPCA donors voted for this or realised what was happening to this once respected organisation?

The RSPCA and a cruel abuse of your generosity. Also scroll down for the RSPCA charging owners of lost pets.

By Quentin Letts

PUBLISHED: 23:54, 19 December 2012 | UPDATED: 00:31, 21 December 2012

Continue reading →

Mitterrand told his confidante Migouli when he was Premier of France.

“I will have the last word,” Mitterrand replied. “Her island, it’s me who will destroy it. Her island, I swear that soon it will no longer be one. I will take my revenge on the upstart English. I will tie England to Europe, despite its natural tendency for isolation. How? I will build a tunnel under the Channel. Yes. I will succeed where Napoleon III failed.”

Mitterand was an active member of the Vichy French administration co-operating with the German Nazis. When he realised the Germans were going to lose the war he quickly changed sides.
 

http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/110663